Answer: Those who are better off economically are likely to have advantages of better living standards.
Explanation: With better living standards, upper economic classes have <u>more acess to education, health systems, better jobs</u>, etc. In this way, the <u>least advantaged classes</u>, that have difficult or<u> no acess at all to such services</u>, are at lose. Without education, the jobs are worse and worse. Being not able to have a well-paid job, a person can't afford health services, therefore resulting in higher death rates among them. That is the idea behind the "social inequality of death" theory.
1. A letter from a Roman General to his wife
3.A diary of a civil war nurse
4. A model boat created by ancient Egyptians for a tomb
Answer:
a) is less effective than a direct cash transfer to poorer nations.
Explanation:
Posner and Sunstein affirm that the policies imposed on rich countries and especially the USA on combating climate change are not really beneficial policies. This is because he states that the USA, although it is largely responsible for the increase in climate change, is not one of the countries most affected by them, so it may seem unfavorable for the government to adopt changes that will promote a large expenditure of money, once that are not affected by the problem. However, the countries most affected are poor countries that, although they are most interested in changes, do not have the money to promote them. In that case, it would be more beneficial for rich countries, such as the United States, instead of promoting economic spending to lessen the impact on climate change, to donate money to affected poor countries, allowing them to use that money to promote beneficial changes in their region.
Answer:
favouring your own country
Explanation:
