1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Verizon [17]
4 years ago
14

What do the original Olympic “games” reveal about ancient Greek culture and values? (Provide as many specific examples as possib

le, but a minimum of three.) What, in your view, is admirable abut the games and what is not?
History
1 answer:
Brrunno [24]4 years ago
5 0

1. The Olympic games were originally invented by the ancient Greeks. They got their name after the highest Greek mountain, which also represented the border with the ''barbarians'' on the north of them, namely the Macedonians, Illirians, Thracians, and Paionians. These games provide a nice clue about the values and culture of the Greeks in this period of time. One thing is the competitiveness that the Greeks had. Also, the striding toward perfect and strong body through exercise and healthy diet is another thing. The pride in representing the city-state and bringing glory to it was another important thing.

2. The thing that is admirable about the Olympic games is that it was an excellent way of competition without having any conflict, but being a peaceful, sporting event, in which people from the different city-states were trying to bring pride to themselves and their city-states. It was also very good because it was motivating the people to be like the competitors, to have healthy diets and regular exercises. The thing that is not admirable about the games is that people form other ethnic groups were not allowed to participate. It was only on few occasions that a single Macedonia was going to be allowed to participate, and when it happened that the Macedonian won, it was seen as big humiliation for the Greeks, so he was not given the honors and price as all other winners. SO we can say that it was a discriminatory competition.

You might be interested in
What did catharune beecher did<br>​
Alik [6]

Answer:

She worked through the Board of National Popular Education (1847–48), a private agency headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio, and in 1852 founded the American Woman's Educational Association to recruit and train teachers to staff schools on the frontier.

Explanation:

She worked through the Board of National Popular Education (1847–48), a private agency headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio, and in 1852 founded the American Woman's Educational Association to recruit and train teachers to staff schools on the frontier.

THIS IS WHAT I KNOW!

5 0
3 years ago
In the mid to late 1800s, the US government granted land to railroad companies to expand their networks. What is another way tha
Ronch [10]
Primarily alternative way that these railroad companies used their land was to either sell it or rent it out to private business, and occasionally individuals, since the rail companies did not always need all the land they were given for development. 
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Based on what you have learned in this lesson, write two to three sentences describing one success and one failure of Clinton’s
cupoosta [38]

When the Genocide Convention was passed by the United Nations in 1948, the world said, “Never again.”

But the history of the twentieth century instead proved that “never again” became “again and again.”  The promise the United Nations made was broken, as again and again, genocides and other forms of mass murder killed 170 million people, more than all the international wars of the twentieth century combined.

Why?  Why are there still genocides?  Why are there genocidal massacres going on right now in southern Sudan by the Sudanese government against Dinka, Nuer, and Nuba; in eastern Burma by the Burmese government against the Karen; in the Democratic Republic of the Congo by both government and rebel forces against Tutsis, Banyamulenge, Hutus, Hema, and Lendu?  Why has ethnic and religious hatred again reached the boiling point in Israel and Palestine; Côte d’Ivoire, and Burundi?                                                     

There are two reasons why genocide is still committed in the world:

1.        The world has not developed the international institutions needed to predict and prevent it.

2.        The world’s leaders do not have the political will to stop it.

In order to prevent genocide, we must first understand it.  We must study and compare genocides and develop a working theory about the genocidal process.  There are many Centers for the Study of Genocide that are doing that vital work – in Australia, Brussels, Copenhagen, Jerusalem, Montreal, Memphis, Minneapolis, New Haven, Nottingham, and elsewhere.

But studying genocide is not enough.  Our next task should be to create the international institutions and political will to prevent it.  Four institutions are needed: centers for early warning, programs for conflict transformation, standing forces for rapid intervention, and international courts for effective punishment.

1.  The U.N. Security Council and key governments need strong, independent Early Warning systems to predict where and when ethnic conflict and genocide are going to occur, and to present policy options on prevention and intervention.  The Brahimi report made by the special commission on U.N. Peace-keeping makes just such a recommendation, and it should be implemented.  Selected country desk officers and top officials of the U.N. system now hold monthly “Framework for Coordination” to discuss current crises, but inadequate staffing prevents long-range strategic planning.  There is not a single person at the United Nations whose responsible for genocide early warning and prevention.  Who do you call? Ghostbusters.

:P

<span>
</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The basic principles in the English Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence have roots in which of the following docu
Anton [14]
<span>The basic principles in the English Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence have roots in A. Magna Carta which gave more rights to the people, and less to the king.
B, C, and D were written after the English Bill of Rights, so they cannot be the inspiration for it, whereas Magna Carta is the only document written many many years before both the English Bill of Rights (1689) and the Declaration of Independence (1776) - Magna Carta was written in 1215. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help with my art history quiz!!! Please!! 40 points
PilotLPTM [1.2K]

A. All Native American nations (tribes) share the same culture. FALSE

D's answer is 2. They show the importance of tradition through symbolic images that represent a clan's history and social status.

Sorry I couldn't answer all of it but those are the answers I know. Hope this helps, have a BLESSED and wonderful day! :-)

-Cutipatutie ☺❀❤

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these is a good example of secular medieval art?
    6·2 answers
  • Why did parliament remove james ii and invite william iii and mary ii to rule england?
    15·1 answer
  • New trade agreements are expected to
    9·1 answer
  • Which has been a direct effect of nationalism in Europe
    5·2 answers
  • Who was Justinian?
    8·2 answers
  • What must occur first according to Eugene Debs before everyone may enjoy the benefits of modern civilization?
    11·2 answers
  • Help
    5·1 answer
  • What did Ivan do with his kingdom in a letter to the Muscovite people?
    6·1 answer
  • What is it called that you cannot be charged with the same crime twice?
    14·1 answer
  • How did technology have an impact on the world during the Scientific Revolution?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!