i believe that the answer is 1,2, 4 and 5
Miranda v. Arizona was the case that made it a requirement for those being arrested to be made aware of his or her constitutional rights.
Considering a point of view it is fair to say that Mr. Ellsberg attacked democracy itself by disclosing the private study. From Ellsberg's view he took it upon himself to inform the public about a crucial issue namely, that the study showed, in his opinion, that the American government had been lying for years about the progress of the war The Pentagon Papers leak may have compromised national security, but only by showing the rest of the world that the US was incapable of keeping its secrets.
Extent to which government should be allowed to have secrecy:
Governmental secrecy has a peculiar quality that results from the lack of a known mechanism for limiting its exercise to specific areas on which reasonable people can agree.
The cost of secrecy extends beyond the spread of mistrust that the government is abusing the public's confidence. It also serves as a means of halting the national discourse in which citizens prepare themselves for important decisions that may require significant sacrifice. The Pentagon Papers serve as the best example of this.
Learn more about Pentagon Papers here:
brainly.com/question/2995313
#SPJ1
Answer:
The Sixteen Kingdoms ruled throughout the period
Explanation:
The period between the Han dynasty and the Sui dynasty in China was a period of chaos, warfare, and constant change of rulers. It is the period in which the so called Sixteen Kingdoms ruled. They were mostly kingdoms formed by smaller ethnic groups in the northern part of China. In order to get as much territory and wealth as possible, these kingdoms were in constant war between each other and with anyone else standing on their way. This period of the Sixteen Kingdoms lasted for 125 years. Soon after, the Sui dynasty emerged, and it managed to finally put things under control.