I think first sentence and last two. The first one is appealing to a pet owner's feelings of wanting to be a good pet owner and the merchant is using that to persuade them to buy the biscuits. The last two sentences are appealing to a person's feelings of loneliness or being left out and using that to convince you to buy a pool. They both appeal to people's emotions in order to persuade them towards action, that's what it means to use pathos.
Answer:
Letter to the District Chief Executive about three problem in my locality.
Explanation:
ABC Apartments
.................
To,
The District Chief Executive
....................
3 May 2016
Subject: Problems faced by residents of ABC Apartment complex.
Dear Sir,
It is with a deep concern for the welfare of the community that I am writing to you about several issues that are presently affecting our locality.
First are the damaged roads and street lights, which leave the roads dark and dangerous at night. There have been numerous accidents that were at times too extreme.
Secondly, there's the issue of water shortage which has left many of the residents unable to even prepare their meals on time. Some are even left to cook their meals with bottled water from the shops, which is expensive.
And thirdly, I would also like to point out the issue of the garbage collection system. Recently, the collectors have stopped coming to our locality, leaving residents unable to dispose of their wastes and stinking the whole area. This has also led to an increase in mosquitoes which is dangerous for us all.
I hope this letter gets your attention. We are looking forward to any response or solution from the concerned authorities.
Thank you.
Regards,
Mr. Ashish Sharma
A resident of ABC Apartments
Answer:
if you look closer you may find it your self
Explanation:
what i am saying is that punctuation is very easy try to do it your self you will become an expert trust me
The bandwagon fallacy is in the insistence that good cities are good because they have rail.
Explanation:
The bandwagon fallacy is where the causation of something is confused as an effect.<u> It is the argument that because all the great cities of the country have light rail, our city too should have the same light rail system to be as good as them.</u>
This argument falls apart because the rail will not curb the problems that the passage itself talks about and then willfully ignores. I<u>n fact, bringing the rail to town will actually aggravate some of the issues mentioned here</u>. Which is why the argument becomes more weak.
