NEW ORLEANS
“This is read as 30 degrees north latitude, and 90 degrees west longitude. The map above shows New Orleans is located where the parallel of latitude that is 30 degrees north of the Equator crosses the meridian of longitude that is 90 degrees west of the Prime Meridian.”
What is the <span>novel? message me and i will help</span>
The correct answer would be, Cultural Comparative Approach.
Testing Western ideas in other cultures is the Cultural Comparative Approach to the study of personality.
Explanation:
A cultural comparative approach is an approach which compares two cultures with each other. In this approach, the Western ideas are tested in other cultures to see if these ideas can be generalized in those cultures or not.
Cultural differences have impacts on people's personalities. All psychologists have consensus that culture affects one's personality generally.
For example, If a person is in Pakistan, and then goes to United States of America, his or her personality will usually be affected by the the new culture. In Pakistan, women usually wear traditional dresses, because it is in their culture. But when they go to USA, they usually wear jeans or skirts and tops, as it is usually worn by women in USA. In this way the personality of the people are affected by the difference in cultures. Similarly, Halloween or other events are not celebrated in Pakistan, but when people go to USA, they celebrate such events, as these are the part of USA's Culture now.
Learn more about Cultures at:
brainly.com/question/2150310
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
Explanation:
Given
Required
Determine the acceleration
This will be calculated using force formula:
Substitute values for Force and Mass
Divide both sides by 62kg
<em>Hence, the wave boarder accelerates at </em>
<em></em>
Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
