You lay out the triangle formula for area which would be A=(1/2)(b)(h)
plug in for variables
375=(1/2)(23.8)(b)
solve for b
Answer:
104.8 in^2
Step-by-step explanation:
There are 2 ways to solve this problem.
The 1st way:
Let's make 2 triangles and 1 rectangle:
Rectangle Length = 8.3
Rectangle Width = 8
So, the left out length will be 17.9 - 8.3
=> 9.6
Since, 9.6 cm is for 2 parts.
=> 9.6 / 2
=> 4.8
So, Height of the Triangle = 8
Base of the triangle = 4.8
Area of a rectangle
=> 8.3 x 8
=> 66.4
Area of the triangle
=> 1/2 x 8 x 4.8
=> 4 x 4.8
=> 19.2
There are 2 triangles:
=> 19.2 x 2
=> 38.4
=> 66.4 + 38.4
=> 104.8
The area of the trapezoid = 104.8 in^2.
The 2nd way is:
Area of a trapezoid
=> Smaller Base + Larger Base / 2 x Height
=> 8.3 + 17.9 / 2 x 8
=> 26.2 / 2 x 8
=> 13.1 x 8
=> 104.8
The area of the trapezoid is 104.8 in^2
Answer:
16 unidades preparan simultáneamente 1200 empanadas por día.
Step-by-step explanation:
Si cada fuente tiene una capacidad de 75 empanadas por horneada y que la mayor cantidad posible ocurre cuando el volumen de producción se cocina simultáneamente, entonces el total de fuentes es la cantidad total de producción dividida por la capacidad de empanadas por fuente. Es decir:
16 unidades preparan simultáneamente 1200 empanadas por día.
Answer:
(3 + 4 + 5 + 7 + 10 + 12 + 15)/7 = 8
(3^2 + 4^2 + 5^2 + 7^2 + 10^2 + 12^2 + 15^2)/7 - 8^2 = 17.14285714
Answer:
Answer:
It can be A. (not B or C)
Step-by-step explanation:
It is A because x-6=0 can be simplified to x=6. Then, 2x + 6, you can divide the whole equation resulting in x+3=0, simplify this and you get x=-3. YES
It is not B because, while x+3=0 results in a zero of -3, 6x-1 can be simplified to be divided by 6. When we do this we get x-1/6=0, which is not equivalent to 6. NO
It is not C because, while x-6=0 results in a zero of 6, -3x can be simplified with the zero product property to get -3x=0 then dividing -3 by 0 giving you 0 which is not equivalent to one. NO
Step-by-step explanation:
