The photograph shows children in Germany after WWI.

Those that held anti-slavery and pro-slavery beliefs wanted to increase populations in territories to make them free or slave St

diamong [38]

Answer:

thats not a question

Explanation:

missouri compromise

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why did Germany pass the Nuremberg Laws under Adolf Hilters leadership

jeyben [28]

Answer:

Two distinct laws passed in Nazi Germany in September 1935 are known collectively as the Nuremberg Laws: the Reich Citizenship Law and the Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor. These laws embodied many of the racial theories underpinning Nazi ideology. They would provide the legal framework for the systematic persecution of Jews in Germany.

Adolf Hitler announced the Nuremberg Laws on September 15, 1935. Germany’s parliament (the Reichstag), then made up entirely of Nazi representatives, passed the laws. Antisemitism was of central importance to the Nazi Party, so Hitler had called parliament into a special session at the annual Nazi Party rally in Nuremberg, Germany. The Nazis had long sought a legal definition that identified Jews not by religious affiliation but according to racial antisemitism. Jews in Germany were not easy to identify by sight. Many had given up traditional practices and appearances and had integrated into the mainstream of society. Some no longer practiced Judaism and had even begun celebrating Christian holidays, especially Christmas, with their non-Jewish neighbors. Many more had married Christians or converted to Christianity.

According to the Reich Citizenship Law and many ancillary decrees on its implementation, only people of “German or kindred blood” could be citizens of Germany. A supplementary decree published on November 14, the day the law went into force, defined who was and was not a Jew. The Nazis rejected the traditional view of Jews as members of a religious or cultural community. They claimed instead that Jews were a race defined by birth and by blood.

Despite the persistent claims of Nazi ideology, there was no scientifically valid basis to define Jews as a race. Nazi legislators looked therefore to family genealogy to define race. People with three or more grandparents born into the Jewish religious community were Jews by law. Grandparents born into a Jewish religious community were considered “racially” Jewish. Their “racial” status passed to their children and grandchildren. Under the law, Jews in Germany were not citizens but “subjects" of the state.

This legal definition of a Jew in Germany covered tens of thousands of people who did not think of themselves as Jews or who had neither religious nor cultural ties to the Jewish community. For example, it defined people who had converted to Christianity from Judaism as Jews. It also defined as Jews people born to parents or grandparents who had converted to Christianity. The law stripped them all of their German citizenship and deprived them of basic rights.

To further complicate the definitions, there were also people living in Germany who were defined under the Nuremberg Laws as neither German nor Jew, that is, people having only one or two grandparents born into the Jewish religious community. These “mixed-raced” individuals were known as Mischlinge. They enjoyed the same rights as “racial” Germans, but these rights were continuously curtailed through subsequent legislation.

5 0

3 years ago

In what way the Manor system was not beneficial to the Serfs?

Leona [35]

Answer:

All the land, not necessarily all physically connected to the manor house, that was retained by the lord of a manor for his own use and support, under his own management.

serfs

Peasants under feudalism, specifically relating to manorialism. It was a condition of bondage that developed primarily during the High Middle Ages in Europe.

villein

The most common type of serf in the Middle Ages. They had more rights and a higher status than the lowest serf, but existed under a number of legal restrictions that differentiated them from freemen.

freemen

Men who were not serfs in the feudal system.

Explanation:

The lord of a manor was supported by his land holdings and contributions from the peasant population. Serfs who occupied land belonging to the lord were required to work the land, and in return received certain entitlements.

Serfdom was the status of peasants in the manor system, and villeins were the most common type of serf in the Middle Ages.

Villeins rented small homes with or without land; as part of their contract with the lord they were expected to spend some time working the land.

Villeins could not move away without the lord’s consent and the acceptance of the new lord whose manor they were to move to. Because of the protection villeins received from the lord’s manor, it was generally not favorable to move away unless the landlord proved to be especially tyrannical.

The manor system was made up of three types of land: demesne, dependent, and free peasant land.

Manorial structures could be found throughout medieval Western and Eastern Europe: in Italy, Poland, Lithuania, Baltic nations, Holland, Prussia, England, France, and the Germanic kingdoms.

7 0

3 years ago

HELP ME PLEASEE ILL GIVE POINTS

Ann [662]

Answer:

a i think

Explanation:

it might be b though its either one ..... someone help me

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Population 71% 29% Railroad Mileage 71% 29% Manufacturing Plants 86% 14% Industrial Workers 92% 8% Use the image to answer the f

kari74 [83]

The Union was confirmed by the most industrialized states in the country. This meant that the production of weapons and tools related to war logistics was controlled by them. Besides having more weapons and supplies, the Union also had more soldiers, as the population was considerably bigger in the north.

Railroads are a sign of development. In terms of war, they helped mobilize troops and resources along the country with relative ease in comparison to their Confederate counterparts. This represented a great advantage for the Union.

Besides having the previously mentioned advantages. The Union also had the naval power on their side and executed the blockade in an attempt to cut the resources from The Confederacy. As a response, the southern states replaced the growth of Cotton with other crops in order to have food supplies.

8 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers