Slavery was found upon the Chesapeake Bay along with eastern
Virginia; plus the south Carolina and Georgia coasts; in a crescent of
lands in Georgia, Alabama and Mississippi; and most of all in the
Mississippi River Valley.
One of the most significant effects of East African trade on different cultural groups was that it put many more Africans into slavery and forced East Africa to rely only on export profits.
In this question, the blue line is known as the
Chattahoochee River, which forms the southern half of the border of Georgia with Alabama.
The rewritten Japanese constitution after World War II guaranteed "personal freedoms" for the Japanese, since the Allies did not want to create another environment in which the Japanese became aggressive.
Most of early history, these was no seperation of church and state, so they were one and the same.
This applies to both the English civil war ( if you can call any war civil) and the Dutch revolt. Both were to end Catholic domination of the Protasant subjects.
All wars are both religious and political. But end up anti-religious as they violate the very tenets of any religion they expound so it is only being about power.
Protasants revolted against the Catholics for freedom but then in-fighting over which Protasant religion is good.
The politics of any war are power and greed. Someone wants what someone else has and demands the right to take it and deny others taking it from them.
Many claim they are trying to protect the ' true' religion or claim for religious freedom and then show they are no better then the heritics they decry and deny others the same freedoms they want,
When all is said and done - all is just for power.
War has never settled any differences. It just pospones the reversal of power as will always happen. The French Revolution almost did by beheading the royals but as many escaped and Napolian brought new ones in. Nothing much changed.
The American revolution - which was the 1st non-religious war started the change for wars to not just be about religion.