1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Evgen [1.6K]
3 years ago
13

What advantage did the British have in fighting the war

History
2 answers:
olga55 [171]3 years ago
8 0

hey mate here is your answer

British have many advantages in fighting the war there are in following ways

1- They can gain popularity in that particular country

2- All the shares and intrest he will got

Norma-Jean [14]3 years ago
5 0
British soldiers were fighting because it was their job, while Americans were fighting for their freedom. Another advantage the colonists had was the fact that American forces were fighting on their own ground.
You might be interested in
The expression “struck a chord” in paragraph 2 is an example of what literary device?
almond37 [142]
I'm pretty sure it is idiom
5 0
4 years ago
How did the Supreme Court change as a result of Ronald Reagan’s presindecy ?
ASHA 777 [7]

Answer:

The Reagan era of the 1980s is often remembered for the President’s pursuit of ending the Cold War and his legacy as the “Great Communicator.” But Reagan’s impact on the Supreme Court was also significant and still relevant today.During his eight years in office, President Reagan elevated a Chief Justice, had three nominations confirmed, one rejected and another nominee withdrawn from consideration in the Senate.

Reagan had signaled a desire to have an influence on the Court during the 1980 presidential campaign, and few will dispute that he did shape the Court’s future through his appointments.

The candidate said he would appoint a woman to the Supreme Court, and he also pledged to reverse the Roe v. Wade decision and any court decision that barred prayers in public schools.

President Reagan made good on his first promise when he nominated Arizona judge Sandra Day O’Connor to the Supreme Court. Reagan personally vouched that O’Connor’s views on abortion would be acceptable to conservatives.

O’Connor was unanimously approved by the Senate in a 99-0 vote on September 21, 1981, with one absent senator personally apologizing to the justice for not being present for the vote.

The rest of Reagan’s history with the Senate nomination process and the Supreme Court wasn’t as smooth. The President then decided to elevate a conservative Justice, William Rehnquist, to the position of Chief Justice in 1986 when Warren Burger retired. Rehnquist overcame liberal opposition in the Senate, and was appointed with a 65-33 vote.

Reagan’s next nomination came when he had to replace Rehnquist as an associate justice and he had two candidates to consider: Robert Bork and Antonin Scalia. He had put both judges on the District Of Columbia Circuit Appeals Court.

After the political debate over Rehnquist elevation to Chief Justice, there was much less political attention given to the eventual nominee: Scalia. Scalia, like O’Connor, received a unanimous confirmation to the Court on the same day that Rehnquist’s elevation was approved, despite having a more conservative record than Rehnquist.

Explanation:

Hope this is what you were looking for

4 0
3 years ago
Which of Congress's powers was at the center of the challenge to the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990?a. The power to raise and
vivado [14]

Answer:

B. The power to control commerce is the correct answer.

Explanation:

It was an act of US  congress meant for preventing the unauthorized possession of firearms in school zones. It applied to parochial, private and public schools and distance of 1000 feet around the school and no private property. Senator Herb Kohl of Wisconsin introduced this law in February 1990 and it was integrated into the Crime Control Act of 1990, President George H. Bush signed it into law. The Supreme court of the US held the Act as an unconstitutional exercise of congressional authority under the commerce clause of the US constitution.

5 0
3 years ago
Would Asoka make a good ruler today? Why or why not?
DerKrebs [107]

Answer:

Indeed Ashoka not just a great ruler but a great emperor ever in the Indian history. No king have ruled such a big empire besides an Ashoka not even Akbar & Aurangazeb. He spread teachings of Lord Buddha in the entire sub continent of India. He no doubtedly ruled over the big part of the eternal world.

3 0
3 years ago
What is this thing all about?
andreev551 [17]
What is what thing all about? There is no attachment and such...
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What argument used to justify slavery appealed to people's religious beliefs?
    7·1 answer
  • What was the importance of the transcontinental railroad
    7·2 answers
  • How many House congressional districts are considered competitive – as in the weaker party has a realistic chance of victory?
    10·1 answer
  • How did Ford create a market for his cars?
    5·1 answer
  • _______ speeches are often given at a graduation ceremonies
    14·2 answers
  • NAFTA: Free Trade and American Economy
    15·1 answer
  • Summarize the Bay of Pigs Invasion and the Cuban Missile Crisis.
    10·2 answers
  • What were the aesthetics they focused on ( Safavid Empire )
    6·1 answer
  • Navigate down the 100 block in Greenwood, also known as the “marquee block.” What do you notice about the businesses and stores,
    10·1 answer
  • How did franklin d. roosevelt’s approach to the united states’ relationship with europe change over the course of his presidency
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!