1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
timama [110]
3 years ago
8

ow did slave labor in the Southern colonies differ from that in the Middle and New England colonies? Slaves worked fewer hours i

n the Southern colonies. Slaves in the Southern colonies usually had jobs other than farming. The Southern colonies had more slave labor because of cash crops. Settlers were not dependent on slaves for labor in the Southern colonies.
History
1 answer:
Degger [83]3 years ago
6 0

<em>C. The Southern colonies had more slave labor because of cash crops.</em>

Explanation:

The colonies in the South definitely relied on slave labor to earn a profit. They focused on owning plantations in order to grow cash crops. Cash crops were crops that people would pay a lot for and were needed, mostly overseas. Some Southern cash crops were indigo, tobacco, and cotton, which were grown in fields on plantations.

During the Civil War, slavery was a huge debate among the Southern and Northern colonies. The South made the argument that they needed slave labor since they made a profit from agriculture and the cash crops. The North was very industrialized during this time and made its profit from industries selling goods, but they also thought slavery was inhumane.

When the South lost the Civil War, slavery ended up getting outlawed. Although slavery was abolished, the prejudice did not stop. The South now needed to rely on another source of income, as they did not have enough labor in order to maintain the same amount of cash crops they were producing beforehand.

You might be interested in
What US foreign policy issue was a motivation for American intervention in Vietnam?
Anastaziya [24]
The foreign policy issue that was a motivation for American intervention in Vietnam was the idea of "containment" which sought to contain communist expansion where it was, as opposed to attempting to eradicate it at the source.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP!! WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!
Effectus [21]
The stock market crash of 1929
4 0
3 years ago
what role did Arkansas governor Orval Faubus play in school desegregation? A) he challenged the legal ruling in Sweatt vs. Paint
Artemon [7]
Orval Faubus played the role of C. <span>he defied the federal government and blocked black teenagers from attending Little Rock Central High School </span>
7 0
3 years ago
What event happened to cause the US to get involved with WW2
lisov135 [29]

Answer:

On 11 December 1941, four days after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and the United States declaration of war against the Japanese Empire, Nazi Germany declared war against the United States, in response to what was claimed to be a series of provocations by the United States government when the US was still officially neutral during World War II. The decision to declare war was made by Adolf Hitler, apparently offhand, almost without consultation. Later that day, the United States declared war on Germany.

5 0
3 years ago
Considering that the Ottoman government denied any orders or mass killings, why is Turkish Army Officer Lieutenant Baas' account
sveticcg [70]

People give different versions of the same story as they want. The Turkish Army Officer Lieutenant Baas' account is important as His first-hand account contradicts the denial.

The Ottoman government  in 1916 was known to have massacres a lot of people.

The Armenian genocide denial was a big case in the world.  The claim made by the Ottoman Empire and the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP) was that they had no hand in the genocide against the Armenian people during World War I.

This was a very big crime that has a lot of documentation on the numbers of  evidences to prove their guilt but they still won't accept that they committed it.

See full question below

Considering that the Ottoman government denied any orders or mass killings, why is Turkish Army Officer Lieutenant Baas' account important?

A. His first-hand account supports the Ottoman government

B. His first-hand account contradicts this denial

C. He had recovered old documents that support the Ottoman government

D. He had recovered old documents that contradict this denial

Learn more about  Ottoman government from

brainly.com/question/25798424

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • According to the philosophy thomas jefferson expressed in the declaration of independence, what was the primary responsibility o
    15·1 answer
  • The National Banking Acts of 1863 and 1864 gave the federal government the power to do all of the following EXCEPT:
    15·2 answers
  • Someone help me on this
    7·2 answers
  • History please help!!!!
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a sacred sacrament of the early Christian church?
    7·2 answers
  • How did having an Absolute Monarchy lead to the French Revolution?
    8·1 answer
  • Were any of these responsible for any future trouble in the United States? If so, which one(s) and how were they responsible?
    14·1 answer
  • What is Congress’ view of the Communists in the world?
    10·1 answer
  • 83. During the Cold War, what was the main concern of the United
    15·2 answers
  • A trader begins his trip along the sea route of the Silk Road in Babylon, going to the Bay of Bengal. What body of water must he
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!