This is false. Technical writing usually has many short sentences and long ones are not common.
1. Choose the tone of the myth.
Is it a cautionary tale on responsibility?
A story of communication with higher powers?
Actions of empathy for the greater good?
A lighthearted, ironic tale of adventure and consequence?
2. Choose the intention of the myth.
Is this the story of a character who is responsible for the creation of something (such as a god, a human, an animal, a personified planet, etc. who has taken action)
OR
Is this the story of the accidental/inadvertent existence of something that created something in the world today?
3. Choose a subject or concept that is interesting to you.
(Ex: the creation of stars, the formation of mountains, the existence of empathy, the origin of sunsets, the flow of the wind)
4. Create strong characters and/or a strong setting that places the reader in the mindset of the myth.
Are you trying to emulate traditional myths: Use impersonal language in the 3rd person to write a cautionary tale about a flaw in human nature that led to the formation of something in the natural world (humans loved to imagine they had an impact on the creation of earth)
Are trying to write a modern take on the myth: Choose a more informative and less critical tone to explain the occurrence of a facet of the world TODAY (something specific to the century) and how it came to be
what is the sentence including the word yiiping?
Answer:
B
Explanation:
What did the kids do to get so many clothes. It's what I got and it said it was right
Answer:
The subject-verb agreement is wrong. The correct sentence would be:
- Excitement between the two groups has risen after the election.
Explanation:
<u>If we ask the verb a simple question, we can find the subject: "What has risen after the election? Excitement between the two groups." Even though the answer is long, the simple subject itself is comprised of just one singular word: "excitement". This is the most important word, the one to which the verb refers. We can even remove the words that come after it, and the effect or meaning will be the same: "Excitement has risen after the election."</u>
The problem with "Excitement between the two groups have risen after the election" is that "have" is agreeing with "groups". However, as seen above, "groups" is not the most important word in the subject. Therefore, the verb should not agree with it.
