One of the most famous<span> people alive during this time was </span>Leonardo da Vinci<span>. He was most </span>famous<span> as a painter, but he was also a scientist, engineer and mathematician. </span>Leonardo<span> is </span>called<span> a "</span>Renaissance man". Another "Renaissance man<span>" was Michelangelo, who was a sculptor, painter, architect and poet.</span>
On the eve of the american invasion of the japanese held island of iwo jima, the mood of the japanese defender of the island, they knew they were on their own. but they were determined to fight as well and as long they could before the inevitable end. thank you for your quesstion.
According to Jefferson himself, you could divide man in two kinds:
1) Those who did not trust people or feared them. Those people, supposedly, wished to prevent them from having powers by giving that power to a specific class that would hold the responsibility of watching over the people and the nation.
2) Those who are confident in the people and their individual liberties and consider them mostly honest and good people. In that case, there would be no need to give great powers to a higher class. In fact, that would be counterproductive to their ideals.
You will find those two lines of thinking in pretty much every country and every culture. They are considered often as Left or Right, Progressive or Conservative, Liberal or Socialist and so on.
That showed up quickly in the USA since when the Whigs party emerged, it did as opposition to the Democrat Party. Showing an early duality from the beginning of the American Democracy. And even if you have a multiparty system like other countries, you can easily find them dividing generally in two sides that internally agree with MOST issues but disagree fundamentally in many with the opposition.
Explanation:
his death 17 Feb 1919 some things i read on it “Canada has been modest in its history, although its history,” said Laurier in 1904, “is only commencing.… The 19th century was the century of the United States. I think we can claim that Canada will fill the 20th century.”In external relations, his objective was to improve Canada's position relative to both the United States and Great Britain. In 1897, he opposed efforts by British authorities to draw Canada into a closer imperial federation. During the South African War (1899–1902), he again chose compromise between English Canadians — who supported military involvement — and French Canadians — who vehemently opposed it. By allowing for the recruitment of a contingent of volunteers, partially paid for by Britain, Laurier found the middle ground. When imperialists demanded that Canada assist the British Royal Navy, which was struggling to stay ahead of the German navy, Laurier compromised. In 1910, he helped pass the Naval Service Act, which established the Naval Service of Canada (later, Royal Canadian Navy). this is just wat i've read an think so plz don't be mad im just trying to help
Answer:
True
Explanation:
They never truly wanted to destroy the south they just wanted to defend the north
