The right alternative is the letter D. This is because when the German leaders signed the armistice, many of them believed that the "Fourteen Points" would be the basis of the future peace treaty, but when the leaders of the governments of the United States, Britain, France and Italy met in Paris to discuss the terms of the treaty, the European side of the "Big Four" had other plans. The United Powers saw Germany as the main instigator of the conflict and, as such, imposed particularly harsh conditions on that country.
The amendment was proposed by the Congress on December 9, 1803, and was ratified by the requisite three-fourths of state legislatures on June 15, 1804.
<span>1) pay off all war debts including state debts 2) raise government revenues 3) create a national bank</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In the case of Chiafalo v. Washington (2020), the Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional for states to place restrictions on who electors can vote for.
I agree with this decision because voting in the Electoral College is a serious thing, and members of the college have to assume this important and serious role. That is why they are members of the Electoral College and expressed their intention to vote for the candidate they supported.
I think there would be no room for faithless electors in the US Electoral College. There is no reason for them to vote for other people if they originally pledge to vote for their candidates.
On July 6, 2020, the case of Chiafalo v. Washington was decided.
It would be industrialization that changed American culture drastically. This is also related to westward expansion, and in many ways led to the conflicts that brought about Civil War.
