1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lisov135 [29]
3 years ago
9

1. What two things does Green say the revolution were not about?​

History
1 answer:
Genrish500 [490]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Green said that the revolution was not tea and taxes

Explanation:

John Green has a very different take on how the American revolution started and why the locals had an uprising against British colonial rule.

He explains that the 'American Revolution' was something completely different from the American Revolutionary War which was a direct, armed conflict with the British.

While the Boston tea party clearly showed a disdain for local Americans, the revolution did not start because of the taxes on tea. The rallying cry 'no taxation without representation' showed a deep rooted belief in many colonists that they were actually seen as second class citizens of the British crown and did not enjoy the same benefits as others.

He also explains how the revolution was for 'rich white men' and for more than a century, the country was run in a way that would benefit only this class of people.

You might be interested in
A 1913 California law enforced Japanese Americans to..
DENIUS [597]
A 1913 California law forced Japanese Americans to : Sell their land
3 0
4 years ago
Read the following passage:
alukav5142 [94]

D.) taking a diplomatic or legislative action to force the European powers to negotiate with the United States

3 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP ME!!!!
Julli [10]

Hello, Well unfortunately there isnt a list of people who tried to figure out the Rosetta Stone but here is the french egyptologist who first read the Rosetta Stone he goes by the name Jean Francois Champollion and this was around the years  1790-1832.

7 0
3 years ago
What is Zinn's approach to the study of history? What does he suggest occurs when history is told as a story of human progress?
alina1380 [7]

Zinn said that study of history should be done from the point of view of the common man. It should not be done from the point of view of the historians or the politicians.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Zinn thought that the way we study history is very boring and that we have been bent under the heavy weight of the history books which lean up on us. They have set from the point of view of the historians and the politicians. This makes it very boring for us to read this subject.

History should rather be studied from the point of view of the common man so that they can understand it better because through this way they can related to it in a better way. When it is told in the form of a story, the interest of the people increases.

5 0
3 years ago
9. Which group was treated most harshly by the US government during
frez [133]
D.) Japanese Americans
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the british feel about the intolerable acts?
    6·1 answer
  • What is the definition of the Allied Powers?
    15·1 answer
  • According to Freud, dream symbols are typically erotic in nature. Please select the best answer from the choices provided T F
    9·2 answers
  • Describe and explain the unintended results of the spanish american war
    5·1 answer
  • Study the cartoon published in 1898 in support of US expansionism. mc009-1.jpg What is the significance of the eagle’s stance? T
    9·1 answer
  • Why was americas victory at yorktown among the most significant battles of the american revolution?
    5·2 answers
  • Check two things that are true of language: Most U.S. citizens speak Spanish. It is not important to most cultures. Home languag
    13·2 answers
  • 1. Do you think the consequences of imperialism colonialism are more positive or negative
    11·1 answer
  • What are the characteristics of Allah
    12·2 answers
  • Choose an argument or claim from the text, either made by the writer or by someone referred to by the writer. Summarize the argu
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!