Green said that the revolution was not tea and taxes
Explanation:
John Green has a very different take on how the American revolution started and why the locals had an uprising against British colonial rule.
He explains that the 'American Revolution' was something completely different from the American Revolutionary War which was a direct, armed conflict with the British.
While the Boston tea party clearly showed a disdain for local Americans, the revolution did not start because of the taxes on tea. The rallying cry 'no taxation without representation' showed a deep rooted belief in many colonists that they were actually seen as second class citizens of the British crown and did not enjoy the same benefits as others.
He also explains how the revolution was for 'rich white men' and for more than a century, the country was run in a way that would benefit only this class of people.
The NAFTA or also known as the North American Free Trade
Agreement, points out the agreement they have with the certain countries in
which has goals of having to eliminate barriers in the trade and investment.
They are ways of having to produce high productivity, an increase with wealth
and improving the resource allocations between three countries.
It would be "none of the above reasons" that the colonists enjoyed such a long period of time with absolute freedom from the government of Great Britain, since the main reason why that it was more economically advantageous to have a "hands off" policy when it came to overseeing the colonies.
