1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Scrat [10]
2 years ago
6

How effective was president Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal legislation in america was it political or social

History
1 answer:
madreJ [45]2 years ago
7 0
I think it was political..................... Yes, it was political
You might be interested in
In the period 1450 - 1750, imperial expansion relied on the increased use of gunpowder, cannons, and armed trade to establish la
MariettaO [177]

Answer:

We can compare the Mongol Empire with the British Empire in three ways:

The Mongol Empire did not colonize as much land as the British Empire.

Several reasons account for this, first, it's a demographic problem: the Mongols were less than the British, so they did not have enough people to populate conquered areas.

Secondly, the lands the Mongold conquered were already inhabited by other ethnic groups and there was not a lot of room.

The British Empire founded colonies in areas that had sparse population: Australia, Canada, the United States, and thousands of colonists emigrated and found room to establish farms.

The Mongol empire was interconnected by land, the British Empire was interconnected by water:

The entirety of the Mongol Empire was located in Eurasia, and spanned across deserts, praires, plains, mountain ranges, and river banks. The British Empire included territories all over the globe, in the five continents, and was held together thanks to the might of the British Navy, by far the most powerful navy at the time.

The British gained more wealth from the Empire than the Mongols:

The height of the British Empire coincided with industrialization. In a positive feedback loop, the British extracted raw materials from their colonies, and transformed them into finished goods and services. This brought enormous wealth to Great Britain.

The Mongol Empire on the other hand, did extract wealth from their colonies, but as they were not industrial yet, they did not so to the same extent.

7 0
3 years ago
The positive effect on the environment that the Kyoto Protocol intended to achieve
Alex Ar [27]

Answer:

failed because developing countries were exempt.

Explanation:

The "Kyoto Protocol" was an international agreement that aimed to cut down the global gases around the world. It was adopted first in<em> Kyot</em>o in<em> 1997</em>. This was the time when the concern for the rising greenhouse gases was alarming. It mandated the countries which were industrialized to cut down their global emissions, this included the USA.

Although the U.S.A signed the agreement at first, they dropped out from it because they felt it was unfair<u> since the developing countries like China and India were exempted from it.</u> The protocol failed because most of the emissions came from the developing countries which were exempted and this <u><em>increased the overall gas emissions around the world</em></u>.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The magna carta was created during the reign of james ii.james i.charles i.john.
Anastasy [175]

The Magna Carta was created during the reign of King John I.

The Magna Carta is a letter granted by John I of England at Runnymede, near Windsor, on June 15, 1215. First drafted by the archbishop of Canterbury, Stephen Langton, to make peace between the English monarch, with ample unpopularity, and a group of rebellious barons, promised the protection of ecclesiastical rights, the protection of barons from illegal imprisonment, access to immediate justice, and limitations on feudal fees to the Crown, which would be implemented through a council of twenty-five barons. None of the sides complied with their commitments and the letter was annulled by Pope Innocent III, which led to the first Barons War. After the death of John I, the government of regency of the young Henry III returned to promulgate the document in 1216 - although stripped of some of its more radical clauses -, in an unsuccessful attempt to obtain political support for its cause. At the end of the war in 1217, the letter was part of the peace treaty agreed upon at Lambeth, where it became known as the "Magna Carta" to distinguish it from the small Forest Charter issued at the same time. Before the lack of funds, Henry III decreed again the letter in 1225 in exchange for a concession of new taxes. His son Edward I repeated the sanction in 1297, this time confirming it as part of the statutory right of England.

The document became part of the English political life and was usually renewed by the monarch on duty, although over time the newly created English Parliament passed new laws, so the letter lost some of its practical significance. At the end of the sixteenth century there was a growing interest in the Magna Carta. The lawyers and historians of the time thought that existed an old English constitution, traced back to the days of the Anglo-Saxons, that it protected the individual freedoms of the English. They argued that the Norman invasion of 1066 had suppressed these rights; according to them, the Magna Carta was a popular attempt to restore them, which made it an essential basis for the contemporary powers of Parliament and legal principles such as habeas corpus. Although this historical account had its flaws, jurists like Edward Coke used the Magna Carta a lot in the early seventeenth century to object to the divine right of kings, proposed by the Stuarts from the throne. Both Jacob I and his son Charles I tried to prohibit the discussion of the Magna Carta, until the English Revolution of the 1640s and the execution of Charles I restricted the issue.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Burkhardt believed that Venice’s great wealth and power were a testament to
yan [13]

Answer: C.  

Jacob Burckhardt believe that Venice accumulate its great wealth and power due to the great military totalitarianism, which use to enforce its terms and defeat competitors. In addition, he is also known for his concepts that were stressed on individualism and secularism. He also revived antiquity and believe that the Reformation was the rebirth of culture.


5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was john C. Calhoun's theory of nullification
Gemiola [76]
Claims that a state in theory has the right to nullify or invalidate and federal law that state deems unconstitutional.
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • · The literacy rate in South Africa is 85%, and its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is $37 billion.
    8·2 answers
  • Throughout the 20th century, Republicans have done which of the following? Select all that apply.
    13·2 answers
  • The industrialization of the northeast made it possible for women to _______
    8·2 answers
  • Why do you think liesel did not seize the opportunity to kiss rudy?
    10·1 answer
  • Who was the 2nd president to be assassinated?
    9·2 answers
  • Who resigned his post in the United States army to help liberate Texas? a. Peter Ellis Bean b. Augustus Magee c. John Long d. Ph
    13·2 answers
  • Please help!!
    11·2 answers
  • What was Socrates's approach to seeking knowledge, and why did some of his fellow Athenians find it controversial?
    8·1 answer
  • Who ruled India in 225 ce
    6·1 answer
  • Will mark brainliest! Please HELP ASAP EXTRA POINTS
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!