Answer: Involved debate over the extent of executive and legislative authority
Explanation:
I just took the test
The word revolution reminds me of citizens protesting and revolting for a different type of government or other reasons.
This is a sentence other 20 words that describes the word revolution.
Answer: Devshirma and slavery have both similarities and differences.
Explanation:
The Ottomans practiced Devshirma as a forcible abduction of Christian boys into the elite Ottoman army ranks. These boys were taken from their families and were enlisted in the elite Ottoman military ranks. Slavery, in itself, is a violent process of alienating people for forced labor. If we look at these definitions, they are similar in themselves. A slave could get his freedom in certain situations, but he always remained a slave during the service.
On the other hand, officials in the Ottoman Empire who found themselves in the state under the means of devshirme could advance in the service. There were many examples when people who became residents of the Ottoman Empire came to the country's highest positions. The Grand Ottoman Vizier Mehmed Pasha Sokolović had just arrived in the Ottoman capital, Constantinople, with a devshirme. He advanced so much in the service that after the sultan, he was the second man of the bulky Ottoman Empire. The very title of Grand Vizier in the empire implied that position.
The correct answer is Keynes.
Keynes supported free markets but as long as these were regulated by state intervention in order to soften the peaks and troughs in the business cycle. Therefore, in his opinion, the three economic questions (what to produce, how and for whom) should be answered by the economic agents in the markets, but always under the supervision of the state.
Smith was an advocate of free markets and of supressing state interventionism. On the other hand, Marx was in favour of massive intervention of the state because he considered markets to produce un unfair distribution of wealth in the states, where the richer ones exploited the poor.
<span>Confucius thought all men were basically good, Confucianism believed that family came first, children should honor their parents. If the family was happy, the people would be happy and consequently, the king would find it easy to rule with a gentle hand. Confucianism also believed in a hierarchical society, that everyone had a place and a job. There is very few opportunity to deviate from that order. If you family was a farmer, his son also was a farmer, a soldier's son also a soldier, a statesman's son becames statesman.
Han Fei Tzi was a Legalist. In Legalism people were thought to be bad in nature. They needed laws and regulations with stiff punishments to keep them in line. It was a harsh system, very Macachiavellian in nature. It promoted the better skilled person over less skilled people. It's a dog eat dog society, if you don't eat you'll be eaten. Upward mobility was possible but at a cost of loosing the polite and courteous society which Confucianism provided.
In the end, China used Confucianism to pacify the people but kept the legalistic regulations which govern the country.</span>
