1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zigmanuir [339]
2 years ago
6

At the end of World War II many European countries were rebuilding and so were eager to buy capital goods and had rising incomes

. We would expect that the rebuilding increased aggregate demand in a. both the United States and Europe. b. the United States but not Europe. c. Europe, but not the United States. d. neither the United States, nor Europe.
History
1 answer:
viva [34]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Both the United States and Europe.

Explanation:

The period following world war second was a period of reconstruction and reorganizing structures in Europe. However, the pace of growth was different in different countries. Allied nations steadfast their economies and support was given by the United States to curb the growth of communism in Europe. On the other hand, the U.S market was reaching new highest as can be seen in the boom of automobile sector and more people engaged in white-collar jobs than ever.

You might be interested in
20 Points. Relationship between the revolutionary war and California?
brilliants [131]

Answer:

leap-2025-grade-7-social-studies-practice-test-answer-key.pdf

Explanation: Plzzzzz Brainlest

3 0
2 years ago
What is the main idea of the madison quote
katovenus [111]
<span>Each branch should be separate and distinct</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following actions supports the philosophy of capitalism?
Semenov [28]
<span>
A politician demands that the government eliminate regulations on how much pollution a business can create.

</span>
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which does not correctly describe a difference between North and South after 1820? A. The North had a larger white population. B
qaws [65]
"<span>C. The South had more miles of railroad track" is not accurate. Railroads were largely situation going from East to West. It is true that the North had a broader industrial base. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the Free Soil Party, and Liberty Party important and major?
goldenfox [79]

Hey!

Answer:

Free-Soil Party, (1848–54), minor but influential political party in the pre-Civil War period of American history that opposed the extension of slavery into the western territories. Fearful of expanding slave power within the national government, Rep. David Wilmot of Pennsylvania in 1846 introduced into Congress his famous Wilmot Proviso, calling for the prohibition of slavery in the vast southwestern lands that had been newly acquired from Mexico. The Wilmot concept, which failed in Congress, was a direct ideological antecedent to the Free-Soil Party. Disappointed by the ambivalent position of the Whig Party toward slavery, “Conscience” Whigs held a convention in August 1848 at Buffalo, New York. There they were joined by delegates from 17 states drawn from the Liberty Party and the antislavery faction of the New York Democrats, known as “Barnburners.” The Free-Soilers’ historic slogan calling for “free soil, free speech, free labour, and free men” attracted small farmers, debtors, village merchants, and household and mill workers, who resented the prospect of black-labour competition—whether slave or free—in the territories.

In early 1840, abolitionists founded the Liberty Party as a political outlet for their antislavery beliefs. A mere eight years later, bolstered by the increasing slavery debate and growing sectional conflict, the party had grown to challenge the two mainstream political factions in many areas. In The Liberty Party, 1840–1848, Reinhard O. Johnson provides the first comprehensive history of this short-lived but important third party, detailing how it helped to bring the antislavery movement to the forefront of American politics and became the central institutional vehicle in the fight against slavery.

As the major instrument of antislavery sentiment, the Liberty organization was more than a political party and included not only eligible voters but also disfranchised African Americans and women. Most party members held evangelical beliefs, and as Johnson relates, an intense religiosity permeated most of the group’s activities. He discusses the party’s founding and its national growth through the presidential election of 1844; its struggles to define itself amid serious internal disagreements over philosophy, strategy, and tactics in the ensuing years; and the reasons behind its decline and merger into the Free Soil coalition in 1848.

<em>You can refer to these 3 paragraphs, </em>

<em>Hope it helps :)</em>

<em>Though I may be wrong :(</em>

<em>Have a great day!</em>

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did American Indians most likely feel about
    14·1 answer
  • Why did the Greek historian Herodotus show bias against the Persians
    7·1 answer
  • Many deaths in World War I resulted from
    12·2 answers
  • The Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union was partly the result of the expansion of the Soviet Union in Centra
    11·1 answer
  • Help ASAP. 60 pionts.
    8·1 answer
  • Select all that apply. In what ways can we understand how civilizations developed? by comparing and contrasting them by looking
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement is an example of an opinion? Canada is the largest country in total area in North America. South Africa is the s
    12·2 answers
  • The earth scientists most likely study forms in ?
    9·1 answer
  • What did the patriots prove at the battle of bunker hill?
    5·2 answers
  • Why did Congress fail in its attempts to force Britain and
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!