The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Anti-Federalist Papers and explain how it supports your position on the ratification of the Constitution.
I am going to choose a quote from Anti-Federalist No. 3, "New Constitution Creates a National Government, Will not Abate Foreign Influence, Dangers of Civil War and Despotism," written by John Francis Mercer. It was published in the Maryland Gazette on March 7, 1788.
This is the quote:<em> "In a national government, unless cautiously and fortunately administered, the disputes will be the deeprooted differences of interest, where part of the empire must be injured by the operation of general law." </em>
That is why antideferalists heavily opposed the creation of a strong central government, as was the intention of Federalists such as Jhon Jay and Alexander Hamilton. I agree with antifederalists like Thomas Jefferson, who believed in a simpler form of government, not despotic, that granted rights to the citizens. These rights were established in the Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the Constitution of the United States, drafted by federalist James Madison.
My answer is The Union was able to stop Confederate supplies from entering Florida.
Answer:
huge ranches had developed in Texas. One factor that led to their growth was changes in the railroads. In the 1860s, most rail lines ended north of Texas, so cattle had to be driven to them. In the 1880s, rail lines were extended into the state.
Explanation:
Answer:
State laws and powers come from federal government and are determined by population and income.
Explanation:
The correct answer is A
California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians was a US Supreme Court landmark decision issued in 1987. It abolished laws which restricted gaming and gambling on Indian reservations. States desired to control gaming in reservations but this decision concluded that Indian gambling could only be restricted in states where all gaming activities were deemed criminal according to state law. It was considered unconstitutional, that the states tried to limit only certain type of gambling activities and not others.
