Answer:
Explanation:
The scope of private property rights in the United States has been greatly reduced during the 20th century. Much of the reduction occurred episodically, as governmental officials took control of economic affairs during national emergencies—mainly wars, depressions, and actual or threatened strikes in critical industries. Derogations from private rights that occurred during national emergencies often remained after the crises had passed. A “ratchet” took hold. People adjusted first their actions, then their thinking, to accommodate themselves to emergency governmental controls. Later, lacking the previous degree of public support, private property rights failed to regain their pre-crisis scope.
Emergency restrictions of private property rights are by no means of concern only to historians of the growth of governmental power. Today, emergency restrictions limit many private rights, and many more sweeping restrictions could be lawfully imposed at the President’s discretion. The possibility is real. Like several presidents before him, Ronald Reagan has dipped repeatedly into the government’s reservoir of emergency economic powers. The potential exists for the greatly expanded use—and abuse—of such powers.
As he committed crimes that can be tried in State court, the last Texas Court to hear John's case is the <u>Texas Supreme Court. </u>
<h3>Which court is John's final court?</h3>
In every state there exists a judicial system that is similar to the federal system because there is a Supreme Court.
The state Supreme Court is the highest judicial court in a state which means that the final court for John in the state of Texas is the Texas Supreme Court.
Find out more on supreme courts at brainly.com/question/2324092.
The 2nd option: “A collection of agencies...”
Criminal law is the law that involves incidents in which an individual commits an act against the public as a whole.
<h3>What is a criminal law?</h3>
This is the type of law that is concerned with the punishment that has to be issued to the offenders of the law.
Criminal laws are related to crimes that could be in the form of threats or harm to others.
Read more on criminal law here:
brainly.com/question/984900
#SPJ12
Answer:
well, the correct first act would be to file a noise complaint, but for the answers given, I would choose D.
Explanation:
A. to sue bates for money damages would be not smart as there is no evidence that he did any damages. he's just using a noisy lawn mower.
B. Bates did not commit a crime as far as we know. unless they have filed multiple complaints, this is just a simple agitating thinghe's doing.
C. to present a signed petition seems a little far-fetched. I belive this would be the correct thing to do if this continues. but the amount of time it would take to get all of the votes it wouldn't even be worth it at the end.
with all of those rolled out, the best answer Is D.
please make me brainliest.
