The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Congressman has to respond to the Big Pizza Lobby taking these considerations in mind.
Congressman has to realize the impact of the presence of this big "company" in the market. Not only for other industries that cannot compete with this huge company but the impact it has on consumers.
The congressman would propose the kind of bill that benefits free trade, competence, and benefits consumers in a free market.
The big company is not going to stay "arms-folded." The company is going to hire lobbyists to negotiate with congressmen in order to promote its particular agendas and personal interests.
Of course, the big company wants to change the rules against it, and modify them to facilitate their interests. The negotiations can make legislators doubt or rethink a regulation. That is when Congressman has to think to support the interests of citizens, who were the ones who took him/her to office in the elections. So congressmen serve the people, not large companies.
Answer:
I think it's Dck Durbin. Just Add an I... It wont let me post his name.
Explanation:
A. When your total of previous payments and applicable credits is more than the tax you owe.
Hope this helps!
1. Embargo - An official ban or trade or other commercial activity with a particular country.
2. Tariff - Tax on imports.
3. Economic growth - The ability of the economy to increase the production of goods and services.
4. Specialization - Workers concentrate on producing those goods and services for which they have a competitive advantage.
5. Currency exchange rate - The price of one country's currency expressed in terms of another country's currency.
6. Quota - Limitation on imports.
7. Voluntary free trade - An ideal feature of a global economy; it is when each party involved in a trade expects to gain from the trade.
8. Trade barriers - Restrictions placed on trade, for example tariffs and quotas.
Answer:
If each suspected drug dealer follows a dominant strategy, he/she should -<em> a. confess regardless of the partner's decision</em>
Explanation:
In game theory, one player would be displaying<u> strategic dominance</u> <u>if he or she chooses a </u><u>dominant strategy</u><u>, which promises a better outcome for this player regardless of the strategy chosen by the player he or she is playing against.</u>
Here, each suspected drug dealer will have a better outcome if he/she confesses and testifies against his/her partner, because in result he/she gets the best possible outcome - immunity.
