1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jarptica [38.1K]
3 years ago
14

_____ is a term that describes a situation in organizations when there is a variety of demographic, cultural, and personal diffe

rences among the people who work there and the customers who do business there. a. Cultural advantage b. Affirmative differentiation c. Diversity d. Cultural proaction e. Acculturation
Business
1 answer:
Iteru [2.4K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer and Explanation:

c. Diversity

You might be interested in
Tommy is from a small town and quit high school to get married. He and his wife have five kids, and his wife stays home with the
mario62 [17]

Answer: d. Cross train the employees in the meat department, so beef cutters can learn how to cut pork and vice versa.

Explanation:

Since the quality of Tommy’s work has not suffered, but the store managers can tell that he is getting bored, the thing that could be done to keep him better engaged is to cross train the employees in the meat department, so beef cutters can learn how to cut pork and vice versa. Cross training helps the workers in the company appreciate the workers of others in other department and shows workers flexibility.

3 0
3 years ago
The situation described in the first excerpt, what is the inspector's opinion of employer taylor, ibbotson, and co.? what phrase
kap26 [50]

Full Question:

Directions: The following excerpts come from reports of child labor practices submitted to Parliament.

The first is from a report by Superintendent of Factory Inspections Robert A. Baker in 1836, three years after the 1833 Factory Act went into effect.

The second is a personal narrative from a report compiled by the Children's Employment Commission nearly 30 years later in 1864. Read the excerpts and answer the questions that follow:

<em>My Lord, in the case of Taylor Ibbotson, and Co., I took the evidence from the mouths of the boys themselves. They stated to me that they commenced working on Friday morning, the 27th of May last, at six, A.M, and that, with the exception of meal hours and one hour at mIdnIght extra, they did not cease working till four o'clock on Saturday evening, having been two days and a night thus engaged. Believing the case scarcely possible, I asked every boy the same question, and from each received the same answer. I then went into the house to look at the time-book, and in the presence of one of the Masters referred to the cruelty of the case, and stated that I should certainly punish It with all the severity In my power....  My Lord, by a clause In the factory act, it Is enacted that, “no more than one penalty can be obtalned from any one person for any one description of offence in any one day” Had I laid the information, therefore, on all the boys for the same offence, the penalty could have only been 20/. [About $100 in 2010] a sum which appeared to me inadequate to the gross nature of the offence committed, I therefore, my lord, varied the Information, so as to enable me to sue for 80/ [about $400 In 2010], being four full penalties, could I have obtained them, laying the first for working two boys more than twelve hours on the Frlday; the second for working a boy before five o'clock on the Saturday morning; the other for working two boys in the night time, between FrIday and Saturday; and the fourth for keeping a false time-book, as to the hours of working. These views, however my lord, were not responded to, I very much regret to say, by the magistrates before whom the case was heard. The parties were only fine 50/. [about $50 fo In 2010] on each Information, and wIth an aggregate of penalties of 102 [about $100 In 20101 escaped.  —Robert A. Baker, Superintendent of Factory Inspections, 1836 </em>

Question: The situation described in the first excerpt, what is the inspector's opinion of employer Taylor, Ibbotson, and co.? what phrases in the report support this

Answer:

The inspectors opinion of Taylor Ibboston and Co, is that they have engaged in criminal activities which are in violation fo the 1833 Factory Act. He is also is of the opinion that they ought to be punished to the full extend of the Law.

Explanation:

In the excerpt, he clearly states:

<em>I then went into the house to look at the time-book, and in the presence of one of the Masters referred to the cruelty of the case, and stated that I should certainly punish It with all the severity In my power....  </em>

<em />

Another phrase which supports his position states:

<em> I therefore, my lord, varied the Information, so as to enable me to sue for 80/ [about $400 In 2010], being four full penalties, ... </em>

<em />

Cheers!

7 0
2 years ago
You expect to receive $20,000 at graduation one year from now. you plan on investing it at 6 percent until you have $100,000. ho
Free_Kalibri [48]
The answer will be $120,000
4 0
3 years ago
The U.S. Treasury has Kleine Toymakers is introducing a new line of robotic toys, which it expects to grow their earnings at a m
ivanzaharov [21]

Answer:

The present  value of the dividends to be paid out over the next six years if the required rate of return is 15 percent is $6.57

Explanation:

Solution:

Given that

The present value =∑ ⁿ t=1 cf/ (1 +r)t

where cf= cash flow

r =the required rate of return

t = the number of years

Now

The present value will be:

cf₁/(1+r)^1 + cf₂/(1 +)^2 + cf₃/(1+r)3 + cf₄/(1 +r)^4) + cf₅/(1 +r)^5 + cf₆/(1+r)^6

Hence,

cf₁, cf₂ cf₃ = 0 as the firm does not expect to pay dividend in the next three years

Note: Kindly find an attached document of the part of the solution to this given question

3 0
2 years ago
Tony's marginal income tax rate is 24%, and he pays FICA tax on his entire salary (7.65%). Tony's employer offered him a choice
Vlad [161]

Answer: The fringe benefit is worth $182 more than the additional salary.

Explanation:

The Fringe benefit is valued at $3,600.

The additional salary after taxes is:

= 5,000 - (5,000 * 24%) - (5,000 * 7.65%)

= 5,000 - 1,200 - 382.5

= $3,418

The Fringe benefit is worth more than the salary by:

= 3,600 - 3,418

= $182

<em>Options are more probably for a variant of this question. </em>

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What percentage of American business owners used money of their own, or form their families, to start or buy a business
    6·2 answers
  • Consider public policy aimed at smoking. Studies indicate that the price elasticity of demand for cigarettes is about 0.8.
    7·1 answer
  • .Can competitors imitate FedEx’s approach in international markets and take market share away from the company? Why or why not?
    7·1 answer
  • Superior has provided the following information for its recent year of operation: The common stock account balance at the beginn
    11·1 answer
  • what's the difference between gross domestic product and gross national product. what is the significance of this distinction fo
    13·1 answer
  • If a check correctly written and paid by the bank for $272 is incorrectly recorded in the company's books for $227, how should t
    8·1 answer
  • Southeast Airlines had pretax earnings of $30 million, including a gain on disposal of a discontinued operation of $5 million. T
    5·1 answer
  • The slope of the supply of loanable funds curve represents the
    8·1 answer
  • The expected average rate of return for a proposed investment of $4,250,000 in a fixed asset, using straight-line depreciation,
    6·1 answer
  • You owe $5,000 on your credit card and you can pay the following monthly payments:
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!