The United States' policy of containment wasn't just military, it was ideological. Back then, we pointed out the differences between Soviet Communism and Communism around the world to weaken the power of its rhetoric, and additionally we appeared to be more successful and had a better standard of living than communists. Today, we can point out the difference between Islamic terrorism and moderate Islam, to degrade support for Islamic terrorism and make it defeat itself by containing enabling states (as Islamic terrorism is supported by enabling states) perhaps via economic incentives,and stopping our support of dictatorships, winning over those in danger of becoming Islamic terrorists. We also built up a system of allies with our containment policy regarding the Soviet Union, which helped isolate the Soviet Union. We can build up support among allies to support us in isolating states that are enablers of Islamic terrorism as well.
Is there anymore background info?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The ideas of John Locke & the Magna Carta evidenced in the concept and practice of town hall meetings in that Locke considered that people had natural rights and the freedom to ask and demand their representatives and political officials the proper explanations to know how they were ruling the country or ask them to help resolve citizen's issues. One way to that was precisely having appointments or meetings with these representatives or officials, where citizens could feel free to ask any question or expose their concerns.
In the case of the Magna Carta of June 1215 signed by King John, the noble barons of England demanded changes to the oppression exerted by the monarchy and offered the king the Magna Carta as a way to establish a way to grant liberties and avoid a rebellion.
Answer: did you try using socratic?
Explanation:
