Answer:
c) identifying the bell as a neutral stimulus; identifying food as the unconditioned stimulus; repeatedly presenting the sound of the bell followed by food; presenting the sound of the bell to produce saliva.
Explanation:
Russian physiologist Ivan Pavlov was studying salivation in dogs during the 1890s and comes up with the theory of classical conditioning in which a neutral stimulus was closely associated with the unconditioned stimulus to obtain a particular conditioned response. the theory involves learning to combine an unconditional stimulus that has already given rise to a specific response with a new stimulus so that the new stimulus results in the same response.
Answer:
Gunny sacking
Explanation:
The overflow of emotions such as a knot in your stomach, increased heart rate, palpitation, etc. It is basically about when a person vents out his anger, to sack their secrets and letting to go all emotional out and resentment flow is called Gunny sacking.
<u>To avoid gunny sacking use these five tips:
</u>
- To pay attention to emotions
- To plan for emotions review in a week
- Feel good rather than right
- To take a couple of therapy
- Three-step out to be taken
-
Answer:
Based on this information, the Republic of Bokenton most likely demonstrates high uncertainty avoidance.
Explanation:
Uncertainty avoidance, in cross-cultural psychology, refers to the tolerance a society shows concerning change, uncertainty, and unpredictability. <u>Cultures that present high uncertainty avoidance are less receptive towards unknown, risky, or unpredictable situations, doing everything they can to minimize or even avoid such situations completely. When making changes, they move carefully, step by step, and always after due planning. That is the case of the Republic of Bokenton as described in the question. Its natives are resistant to change, not appreciating risk-taking.</u>
The problem starts already earlier:wildlife experts can only estimate the number of species in the world generally!
This is the case because there are simply too many species, and it takes time to documents them; because some areas (ocean bottom for example) are very hard to access and because sometimes it's hard to know whether we're talking about a new species or a variation within the same species.
so if we even don't know how many species there are, it's even harder to know how many are endangered.
B. Supreme Court because it involved a constitutional law Would not be the other two because he isn't in the military now (no military tribunal) and it is a Federal question of law so no state court or county court involvement. The only other option (which isn't there) would be a federal district court.<span />