This house of the Jason is investment asset because he is not living up in his Ogden’s house while people (sports enthusiast and their families) are willing to take that house on rent.
Explanation:
According to me this house is a very good investment asset because people (sports enthusiast and their families) are willing to take that house on rent while he is not living up there. The every month rent money can be seen as the good lifetime investment or return cost of his property.
This property is real estate which is good source of generating money to continuous years or lifetime though he need to spend on damage or maintenance cost.
Answer:
option C Holland is your answer ☺️☺️☺️
I can't write a full essay for you, but I will give some information, maybe this will help
It was a unilaterally (one-sided) decision of the Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in response to an "internal disturbance" in the country and it was in effect from 1975 to 1976.
it remains very controversial today in the discussions of recent history in India.
<span />
Answer:
-For example, the United States is a society that encompasses many cultures. Social institutions are mechanisms or patterns of social order focused on meeting social needs, such as government, economy, education, family, healthcare, and religion.
-The church was undoubtedly the most important social institution in the colony. Factories, hospitals, schools, and other social institutions were established. Amid the Panic of 1837, many began to criticize social institutions. These dinners were a Chicago social institution for more than 50 years.
Explanation:
I hope this helped :)
Answer and Explanation:
1. Prosecutors may claim that the inaccurate report to which Rachel had access could induce misinterpretation on her part and that, in any case, Peter was already on the police for vandalism, which contributed to Rachel's conclusion. These justifications would not be successful, because Rachel had many ways to find out what actually happened to Peter.
2. Peter would sue Rachel for defamation and would likely succeed, as he has several witnesses that Rachel released incorrect information and that it affects his reputation.
3. The current malice is necessary in this case because Peter is a very well-known and popular person, and it is important that the current malice is inserted in the case, to speed up the process.
4. The fair report privilege can be used to protect Rachel, since the false information about Peter that she exposed, had as its only source a public document that induced her to publish the defamation.
