1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mashutka [201]
3 years ago
8

Why were some people critical of britains imperialists practices

History
1 answer:
Paha777 [63]3 years ago
5 0

Britain's imperialist practices were often only great for Britain, not for the colonies, which was seen in the US, India, China, and many many other colonies which were on the verge of disaster because of imperialist ruling.


You might be interested in
Which legal change after the American Revolution most likely resulted from this grievance?
olganol [36]
The American Revolution was the U.S breaking apart from the oppressive British government. We broke away because the british wasn't listening to the need of the people and taxing them without representation. 
8 0
3 years ago
Analyze how the development of Renaissance humanism, the printing press, and the scientific method contributed to a new theory o
Ganezh [65]

Renaissance was a new philosophy questioned the responses of the church for natural phenomenons and encouraged people to embrace the scientific process that allowed people to discover new things.

The scientific process that emerged from this “break” from science enabled scientists, such as Isaac Newton and Rennée Descartes to start a scientific revolution which changed our concept of the universe forever.

The Printing press was also a very important factor because it led to the emergence of the scientific progress to all European countries, the press made possible for an invisible community to become known and thousands of scientists were able to publish their discoveries. The Printing Press also made possible for science to develop a unified language that could be used in all languages.

3 0
4 years ago
(50 Points + Brainliest answer if it's detailed, original, and clear.)
nadezda [96]
Zealots were a political/philosophic movement in first century (what I call) Israel. They were (if I can put it this way) a sort of uncouth bunch who thought the only way to free themselves from Roman rule was to oppose the Romans with force. 

That was their platform. They did not take into account that the Roman's were a huge military power that was ruthless when antagonized. As these things go, Rome was a pretty good ruler. At least they knew the difference between meaningful opposition and tolerance of differences.

The zealots did not see Rome that way. They believed that any interference was too much interference. 

That's when Rome got upset and the first Jewish War of 65 AD or so began. It was like sticking your arm in a hornet's nest. The Zealots had gained the largely unwelcome wrath of Rome. The zealots were unlucky (in a way). If they had picked a time that a warrior/emperor was not leader, their opposition may have evaporated. It would be like hitting a marshmallow. Rome may have considered it an internal affair. They had up to this point. Even though some of the Pharisee priests supported the Zealots, the alliance was destroyed by the unwillingness to negotiate further. 

Anyone who is really dedicated can be termed a Zealot in modern times. I am using the term to describe someone that is Zealous. You could look up Galatians 1:11 - 14 to see how  Paul used the term. This connection between Paul and Jewish leaders (including Zealots) is really hotly debated. It's another hornet's nest.
3 0
3 years ago
What were the values of the middle class? How did they differ from the values of those above and below them on the socioeconomic
masha68 [24]

The creation of distinctive classes in the North drove striking new cultural developments. Even among the wealthy elites, northern business families, who had mainly inherited their money, distanced themselves from the newly wealthy manufacturing leaders. Regardless of how they had earned their money, however, the elite lived and socialized apart from members of the growing middle class. The middle class valued work, consumption, and education and dedicated their energies to maintaining or advancing their social status. Wage workers formed their own society in industrial cities and mill villages, though lack of money and long working hours effectively prevented the working class from consuming the fruits of their labor, educating their children, or advancing up the economic ladder.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The countries of Europe expanded the weapons of self-destruction during World War II. True or False?
N76 [4]

this is true. The countries of Europe expanded the weapons of self-destruction during World War II.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which European countries are landlocked? Choose all that apply.
    6·2 answers
  • How have present-day societies been affected by European imperalism? (1 point) Group of answer choices Ongoing rebellions contin
    5·1 answer
  • How have archaeologists and historians learned about the daily lives of ancient Egyptians?
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following was a popular but expensive way to travel in the mid-1800s?
    12·1 answer
  • He main purpose of the legislative branch is to
    13·2 answers
  • What does the Declaration of Independence say about rights?
    9·2 answers
  • What seems to be the purpose of this document that was written by William Penn?
    12·2 answers
  • Christianity key terms
    14·2 answers
  • What was another name for the white mans burden
    15·1 answer
  • What is the correct order of events that led to the breakup of the Soviet Union?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!