Perhaps you, like me, were raised essentially to think of the slave experience primarily in terms of our black ancestors here in the United States. In other words, slavery was primarily about us, right, from Crispus Attucks and Phillis Wheatley, Benjamin Banneker and Richard Allen, all the way to Harriet Tubman, Sojourner Truth and Frederick Douglass. Think of this as an instance of what we might think of as African-American exceptionalism. (In other words, if it’s in “the black Experience,” it’s got to be about black Americans.) Well, think again.
"There's a fascinating psychological reason behind your belief in ghosts<span>. Halloween is a time to celebrate </span>ghosts<span>, vampires, and everything supernatural. ... More than a third of </span>people<span> surveyed also said they </span>believed in ghosts<span> or spirits returning from the dead."</span>
I know this is late but the answer was The fire ate through the forest because in that sentence it was like the fire was living
The effect of an omniscient third-person narration would be (C) The reader would have a better understanding of the thoughts and opinions of the Aulds.
This narrator, oblivious to what happens, tells everything that occurs to the characters. Knows the characters in a very intimate way and give an account of their most recondite thoughts. Usually equate to a god: a being who sees everything, knows everything.
Certain characters in a story could seem one way but turn out to be different in the end. For example, a character could be nice throughout the entire story up until the turning point. This certain character could turn out to be the antagonist after all and we wouldn't suspect It or vice versa. The antagonist could turn into a protagonist towards the end. It all depends on how the character is developed and presented.
