Defense is responsible for proving a person’s innocence
Brainliest?
Answer:
terry v. ohio
Explanation:
Terry v. Ohio, in 1968, was a major decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not in violation when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."
Answer:
1. "Loose lips sink ships." Share certain information can jeopardize OpSec, and result in advantages for enemy troops.
2. 1A should protect ALL speech. censoring specific words is a form of bias. People should instead be taught coping skills when presented with ideas they find objectionable. "Hate speech" presumes there is a speaker and a listener. The speaker can share anything he likes. The listener is the regulated party. When presented with objectionable ideas, he has choices: he can choose the respond calmly and reasonably; he can respond with aggression; or, he can ignore it and walk away.
Answer:
The recording and storage of information related to a case have changed by using databases to help compare bullets, drugs, and trademarks found at a crime scene or during an investigation.
Undoubtedly, the aspect of forensic science that has had the greatest impact on society is that of DNA fingerprinting. ... The advances in DNA profiling have also led to the exonerations of many former criminals. Old cases have been re-opened, and with DNA testing, many supposed culprits have been proven innocent.
Explanation:
