1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nataly862011 [7]
3 years ago
11

What are three key administration officials as of 2006.

History
2 answers:
a_sh-v [17]3 years ago
7 0
GEORGE J. OPFER, RICHARD SASSOON PAUL KEARNS.
Inessa05 [86]3 years ago
5 0

As Attorney General Alberto Gonzales goes before the Senate Judiciary Committee to testify on the firing of eight U.S. attorneys, lawmakers want to know what role other members of the Bush administration played. Here, a look at some of the officials involved:

Getty Images

Michael Battle: Battle ran the office in Washington, D.C., that oversaw all U.S. attorneys. He was directed to call the seven dismissed prosecutors to inform them that they were to be removed on Dec. 7, 2006. 

Battle has testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee behind closed doors. According to Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY), Battle told the committee that he was not aware of any performance problems with several of the fired prosecutors until just before he was asked to call them. The Justice Department has said that the prosecutors were fired for performance-related reasons. 

Battle also told the committee that Gonzales was at a Nov. 27, 2006, meeting where a memo listing the U.S. attorneys to be fired was distributed, Schumer said. Gonzales has denied seeing that memo. Battle resigned as the scandal emerged, though the Justice Department maintains his departure was long-planned.

Michael Elston: Chief of staff to Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty. Elston was part of a senior group at the Department of Justice that was consulted about the U.S. attorney firings. He exchanged e-mails with Kyle Sampson prior to the firings, receiving updates on White House approvals. After the eight attorneys were fired, Elston coordinated when they would leave their jobs. 

You might be interested in
What might have happened if MacArthur had convinced Truman to expand the fighting into China? How might today’s world be differe
Rufina [12.5K]

Answer:

I'll try my best

Explanation:

MacArthur was a one trick pony: Amphibious assaults. He would overwhelm coastal / island garrisons with Battle Ship delivered fire power, and inundate the island with American Soldiers and naval airpower into submission. He played his one trick in Korean War at Incheon. However, he has never conducted a successful high intensity land campaign. He did not partake in Okinawa, and failed to stop a combined arms assault on Luzon, as well as in Korea. In fact, his recommendation in the winter of 1950 was to evacuate Korea and reattempt an amphibious landing. US and Korea were lucky that he was fired at that point, and Ridgeway who cut his teeth in Europe brought the Chinese offensive to a halt in early 1951 at Chipyong Ni.

So, any counterfactual involving MacArthur staying onboard, would involve him expanding the war into China by assault landing Taiwanese (ROC) troops into Fujian, and perhaps into Yungui region, to try to link back up with RoC remnants on the Yunnan-Burma border. US Troops would have been landed alongside RoC forces into Shanghai - Nanjing region, replicating the successful Japanese amphibious landings there a decade earlier.

RoK forces and USMC would have reeneacted Incheon landing, perhaps coupled with a simultaneous landing at Wonsan, effectively double enveloping the PVA in southern Korea.

Will it have succeeded? PRC and NorKo had no real Navy at the time, and US enjoyed uncontested Air Supremacy. Only impediments to sea lane logistics would have been the Typhoons, and other natural disasaters.

MacArthur also wanted to remilitarize Japan and to use its veterans in this expended war effort. Most likely, his splintered efforts on multiple fronts would have been contained and eliminated in detail by the sheer mass of trained reserves that PLA had in early 1950s. However, if he did somehow succeed in expanding the beachheads and eventually connecting them, the area contorlled by US and proxy forces would have closely resembled the final disposition of troops by IJA in the summer of 1945, minus Manchuria. China will have been forced to recall the PVA to bolster the defense of Manchurian and Hebei. Korea would have been united, possibly, but at this point, there would have been a strong likelihood of Russia entering the war to defend Manchuria, and retake Korea… and perhaps a European Front opening, beginning with an overrunning of Berlin.

All in all, Truman made the right decision to remove this overrated one trick pony whose time had come.

7 0
2 years ago
HELPP!
Monica [59]

Answer:

b. tillman

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did the 3/5ths compromise make in terms of the number of representatives for the states
VashaNatasha [74]
It allowed southern states to count 3/5 of the slave population as population for representatives.
3 0
3 years ago
What concern did Romans have about Julius Caesar?
Iteru [2.4K]

Answer: Julius Caesar would have to much power than it would take then to a war that they might not win.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Joseph said the purpose of his son John was to make ready the way for Jesus.<br><br> True<br> False
pav-90 [236]
That would be true because he was an important part in the Book Of Genesis.
Hope It helps
6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What effect did the second industrial revolution have on transportation?
    6·2 answers
  • The United States placed nuclear missiles in this country, causing Russia to place some in Cuba.
    15·2 answers
  • Prussian and German statesman ·German Chancellor from 1871 to 1890 ·Nicknamed "The Iron Chancellor" ·Leader in German unificatio
    8·1 answer
  • president nixon claimed that he had the right to protect the privacy of conversations, which led to a constitutional conflict ov
    15·2 answers
  • Use the six vocabulary words above to write a summary of what you learned in the lesson
    8·1 answer
  • The powers of the commander in chief of the armed forces belong to the
    5·2 answers
  • The United States Constitution is perhaps the most important document in American history. This plan created a stable government
    15·1 answer
  • Question 8 (1 point)
    11·1 answer
  • 1. Why was there a Great Depression? 2. How did ordinary people respond to the Great Depression? 3.How was President Roosevelt's
    8·1 answer
  • Do you think it is important that the United States have a strong central government? Why or why not?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!