I believe it was because the republicans did not want a large government and having a National Bank (I'm not sure if this is the bank you are talking about) would make the government even larger and they felt that it would take the power from the people.
Mark me brainliest if this is the correct answer and helps you! Good Luck! :)
One Soviet, One american, One British, One French
Answer:
you are very smart and helpful great job
Explanation:
Answer:
What caused the tension between the Soviet Union and the United States after the war? replaced Churchill as Britain's representative mid-conference, because Churchill's party lost a general election. He promised Roosevelt that he would allow free elections but did not keep this promise.
Explanation:
google
Please see the complete question below.
"It is not the cause of one poor printer, nor of New York alone, which you are now trying. No! It may in its consequence affect every free man that lives under a British government on the main [continent] of America. It is the best cause. It is the cause of liberty. . . . Nature and the laws of our country have given us a right to liberty of both exposing and opposing arbitrary power (in these parts of the world at least) by speaking and writing the truth." — Andrew Hamilton, 1735 This courtroom summation helped establish which democratic principle in colonial America?
1.trial by jury
2.equal voting rights
3.protection of private property
4.freedom of the press
Answer:
The Answer is option (4) Freedom of the press.
Explanation:
To begin with, Freedom of the press is one of the fundamental rights of a democratic society. It helps various electronic and printed media especially newspaper and magazines to report news without fear of being restricted, controlled or censored by the government.
This right or democratic principle was helped established by a lawyer Andrew Hamilton in 1735 while he was defending a newspaper publisher called John Peter Zenger. The publisher was charged with Libel simply because he published criticism of the government.
Defending the publisher, Andrew Hamilton put up a long speech (that includes the court summation in this question) arguing that true statements of criticisms should not be considered as libel. He was able to make the judge and jury agree to his argument that truth is a defense against accusations of libel.
