Answer:
Abolitionists from the beginning of American independence saw slavery as a cruel practice on other human beings. They despised that Africans were taken from their native countries and forced to work in cruel conditions in plantations. This does NOT mean that abolitionists saw Africans as equal to them. In fact, the majority, including Africans themselves, believed that Africans could be most prosperous in Africa (there was later a project to bring African Americans to Liberia). They believed that it was impossible for 'white' and 'black' Americans to live peacefully in the same society.
Women in the late 1800's still could not vote.
<span>The name of the poem became a nominal designation of the mission of the imperialists in the colonial possessions.
Kipling depicts the non-European peoples of them as underdeveloped, dangerous and demanding constant control and assistance from the "white nations". In this regard, the text was often viewed as racist and pro-European-chauvinistic, as a cover for colonial policy, primarily by Britain, justifying its capture in Asia and Africa by humanistic considerations.</span>
North: They had troops, guns, equipment, and provisions inside, and they owned it, and so they wanted to keep it.
South: It was located in the South, and they thought it was rightfully theirs, and that is why they wanted it
It didn't really have any strategic importance, however, it had political importance
hope this helps
If, the war described in the question is referred to second war then:
This war was considered as the greatest war configuration in the history in the humanity unleashed by nazi Germany, fascist Italy and militaristic japan.
At the early years of the war the ally countries were France, england and soviet Union.
The largest losses corresponded to the Soviet Union wich lost 27 million people.
