The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In the case of Chiafalo v. Washington (2020), the Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional for states to place restrictions on who electors can vote for.
I agree with this decision because voting in the Electoral College is a serious thing, and members of the college have to assume this important and serious role. That is why they are members of the Electoral College and expressed their intention to vote for the candidate they supported.
I think there would be no room for faithless electors in the US Electoral College. There is no reason for them to vote for other people if they originally pledge to vote for their candidates.
On July 6, 2020, the case of Chiafalo v. Washington was decided.
Its C. linking regional economies through improvements in transportation
Answer:
no,please do your own work,this is not benifting you by asking someone to write a letter for you.You got this!!
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is<em> D) he was an ally against the spread of communist influence.</em>
Explanation:
Mobuto Sese Seko, as the dictator of Congo, was known for this brutal regime. In his public speeches, he spoke against colonial intervention and influence. He also described himself and a maverick who as either political, left, either right and not even centre.
In practice, he built a cult of personality around him and became wealthy by exploitation his power and position in the country.
However, countries such as United States, and even Belgium and France provided him with strong political and economic support.
They saw him as the most powerful force against the spread of communism in the region and decided to ignore his shortcomings.
Hamilton wanted to build the first national bank and Jefferson wanted to not build a bank because of debts they had to still pay back.
