1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
-Dominant- [34]
3 years ago
13

In the case of Chiafalo v. Washington (2020), the Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional for states to place restrictions

on who electors can vote for. Do you agree with this decision? Why or why not?
History
1 answer:
Sergio039 [100]3 years ago
8 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

In the case of Chiafalo v. Washington (2020), the Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional for states to place restrictions on who electors can vote for.

I agree with this decision because voting in the Electoral College is a serious thing, and members of the college have to assume this important and serious role. That is why they are members of the Electoral College and expressed their intention to vote for the candidate they supported.

I think there would be no room for faithless electors in the US Electoral College. There is no reason for them to vote for other people if they originally pledge to vote for their candidates.

On July 6, 2020, the case of Chiafalo v. Washington was decided.

You might be interested in
"All of North Korea is a jail" with referencing this quote, what can you assume about the type of
yKpoI14uk [10]

Answer:

Autocracy:a country state or society with one person with absolute power.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did Pres. Truman believe that political change would come to the Soviet Union?A. The failures of the Soviet Nuclear programB
Elena-2011 [213]
<span>The correct answer is B. The appeal of freedom of the containment of communism. Both space programs were successful, just like their nuclear programs. One could even say that the Soviet space program was more successful considering they were both the first in space, and the first to have a space walk, while the US only landed on the moon first.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The reliance on civil servants to manage tax collection in the Roman Empire is an example of?
jok3333 [9.3K]

The reliance on civil servants to manage tax collection in the Roman Empire is an example of?

A a political characteristic of the Roman Empire

B a social characteristic of the Roman Empire

C an economic characteristic of the Roman Empire.

D a geographic characteristic of the Roman Empire

Answer:

A a political characteristic of the Roman Empire

Explanation:

The use of civil servants by the Roman Empire to manage tax collection is an example of a political characteristic of the Roman Empire.

During the Roman Empire, a Civil servant is a bureaucrat who is appointed on meritocracy and is brought to work for a particular government agency. One of their functions was in the management of taxes and this is a political characteristic of the empire.

5 0
3 years ago
The goals of the Coronado expedition included finding the Seven Cities of Cíbola and __________.
yanalaym [24]

Answer:

The correct answer is C. The goals of the Coronado expedition included finding the Seven Cities of Cíbola and claiming all the lands north of Mexico for Spain.

Explanation:

Francisco Vasquez de Coronado was a Spanish explorer, best known for the discovery of the southwestern United States.

Coronado arrived in New Spain in 1535 and four years later he became governor of the province of Nueva Galicia (which consisted of the Mexican states of Aguascalientes, Jalisco and Zacatecas). There he heard the stories of the Spanish explorer Cabeza de Vaca about the seven golden cities of Cibola, believed to be a rich Native American settlement northeast of the province. Coronado decided to conduct an expedition over land, to explore and add the area to Spain.

During the trip, the Grand Canyon, the Rio Grande and the southern Rocky Mountains were discovered. The expedition was a flop because no gold was found. Their discovery was a serious setback after the murderous long journey, the danger of the Indians and the food shortage. They had hoped for a lot but this did not live up to their expectations in any way.

4 0
3 years ago
Why was controlling the Mississippi River so important to the North?
andriy [413]
It was very important for controlling the Mississippi River because it had easier trade since it led off to the gulf of Mexico which was an excellent trading spot, and well the north needed it to make trade easier to obtain
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • c) Identify, based on your reading, ONE specific example of how the canal system was both a driving force and a consequence of i
    7·1 answer
  • Why did the Apache choose that response to the Army’s request for a meeting in 1883? Select all that apply. The Apache trusted a
    10·2 answers
  • Communist leaders outside of Czechoslovakia were very alarmed about the Prague Spring because they also believed in the ________
    14·2 answers
  • Why is danube river important to eastern europe?
    8·1 answer
  • What is a synagogue?
    11·1 answer
  • What is the most likely reason the republics of Yugoslavia held together until the fall of communism?
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT true about John Jay?
    15·1 answer
  • О
    9·1 answer
  • Which best explains why the North advocated for high protective tariffs in the first half of the 19th century? a.Tariffs kept th
    13·2 answers
  • How can we develop national unity?​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!