1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
-Dominant- [34]
2 years ago
13

In the case of Chiafalo v. Washington (2020), the Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional for states to place restrictions

on who electors can vote for. Do you agree with this decision? Why or why not?
History
1 answer:
Sergio039 [100]2 years ago
8 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

In the case of Chiafalo v. Washington (2020), the Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional for states to place restrictions on who electors can vote for.

I agree with this decision because voting in the Electoral College is a serious thing, and members of the college have to assume this important and serious role. That is why they are members of the Electoral College and expressed their intention to vote for the candidate they supported.

I think there would be no room for faithless electors in the US Electoral College. There is no reason for them to vote for other people if they originally pledge to vote for their candidates.

On July 6, 2020, the case of Chiafalo v. Washington was decided.

You might be interested in
Which of the three branches of government interpret the Constitution?
frosja888 [35]
I think it is the legislative branch <span />
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the primary incentive for the implementation of the marshall plan
____ [38]

<span>The primary incentive for the implementation of the Marshall Plan was that American leaders hoped that U.S. economic assistance would prevent Europeans from turning to Communism. In 1948, this plans was enacted by the 80th United States Congress as the response to the European financial crisis that took place a year before. It was an act of  economic aid to Western Europe that was meant to help rebuild economies that crashed during the World War II. The main goals were: to erase trade barriers, enact the modernisation of industry and to prevent the spread of Communism.</span>

4 0
3 years ago
Help Pleaseeee easy points
sukhopar [10]
D. Gideon v. Wainwright
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the Portuguese not draw on local populations for the labor needed on Brazilian plantations?
finlep [7]
Because they really wanted to do their own work and was cut off.
4 0
3 years ago
1 ) The technology and factory assembly lines of the 1900s changed American life forever.
Archy [21]
I think its true for all of them
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of these is the primary cause of the failure of Britain’s southern strategy?
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement describes public opinion in the United States before and during the Spanish-American War?
    8·2 answers
  • In a state's judicial branch, the supreme court hears appeals
    5·2 answers
  • 1 . nob son of aaron who faithfully served god as priest 2 . ithamar leader under whom the second temple was built 3 . zerubbabe
    6·1 answer
  • Porque criaram o dia da agua?
    12·1 answer
  • Tyler has 3 times as many books as Mai.
    8·1 answer
  • Muslim traders built trading posts in Southeast<br><br> Asia and taught Islam there.
    14·1 answer
  • ?????????????????????????????????/
    10·2 answers
  • How were slaves primarily used?
    10·2 answers
  • How did the colonists try to address their concerns?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!