How did Hippocrates differ from Herodotus?

2 answers:

8 0

Hippocrates was a physician who created a statement of basic ethics, while Herodotus was a historian who shaped how events are recorded.

In fact nowadays, there are some medical students who have to take Hippocratic oath when becoming doctors, which states how they should behave as doctors.

Hippocrates was a Greek physician of the Age of Pericles who is considered one of the most notable figures in the history of medicine.

makvit [3.9K]4 years ago

5 0

Hippocrates was the founder of medicine, regarded as the greatest physician of his time, based medical practice on observations of the human body. Where as Herodotus wrote about the wars between Persia and Greece and he became one of the first true historians in Western civilization.

You might be interested in

Which of the following describes an effect of prosperity on Japanese society?

Monica [59]

The Japanese valued art, literature and life their garden of cherry blossoms are beautiful in paintings and real life.

4 0

3 years ago

Provide at least two examples of how colonists began to develop representative governments.

Vlada [557]

One example that can be cited as a representative government is The Virginia House of Burgesses, which was the first legislative assembly of elected representatives formed in the 13 colonies. This assembly was created in 1619 by the Virginia Company.
Another example that can be cited is William Penn's Frames of Government of Pennsylvania. This was a constitution for the colony<span> of Pennsylvania. These frames are important as they were already too forward for the time and set the base for democracy.</span>

6 0

4 years ago

Explain the ideologies implied by the statements of: the letter to the u.s. congress signed by 100 leading economists, joseph st

luda_lava [24]

The declarations of the letter to the U.S. Congress by the economists concerning the bailouts are evidently specified the disagreement of the source of the letter about the GM bailout. The document stated that the bailout would disrupt the notion of free market in U.S. and that it will break the people who held in the free market (Velasquez, 2012). Also, the bailout and government interference will shift the free market economy into socialism (ibid). The economists and other parties which is convoluted in the making of the letter, sustained the free market economy. They do not approve on government interruption as it disrupts the mechanism of the market that is free of any interference particularly from the government. The sources of the letter thought that it was GM’s own accountability to bail itself out of the insolvency. The bankruptcy was a consequence of bad management of the company and it was its own accountability to resolve the matter. The interference by the government will move the market mechanism. The bailout will disturb the equal right of the people of life, freedom, and possessions as what John Locke’s notion. Furthermore, government meddling will also lower the public’s safety based on Adam Smith’s theory.

3 0

3 years ago

Many countries do not have freedom of the press, as this freedom can, in certain situations, directly interfere with governmenta

Pachacha [2.7K]

It’s B

Explanation is 20 characters

7 0

3 years ago

Which action is an example of domestic policy rather than foreign policy?

Nookie1986 [14]

Answer:

the answer is B

Explanation:

because domestic is within the US not outside (foreign)

5 0

3 years ago