At some point in everyones life we’ve been pure pressured to do something. Whether we like it or not we will have to make a decision when the opportunity presents itself. We have to choose between right and wrong. Peer pressure in teens is particularly interesting because teens make decisions with a brain that isn’t fully developed. Unlike an adult’s brain, a teens brain has many changes to undergo some of which shape the way how teens problem solve, interact, and understand the environment around them. During these critical stages of a young adults life it is extremely important that they are able to interact and experiment with the world around them. It is important to point out that a teen should experiment in a safe and positive environment. Peer pressure can be a good and bad thing depending on what an individual is being pressured to do. For example if a teen is being pressured by five of his or her friends to walk a 6k fun run assuming the individual is in good health and a good state of mind this wouldn’t really be considered peer pressure it would be considered more along the lines as motivation. On the other hand if a teen is pressured to steal an item from a store then that’s when it crosses the line. Peer pressure in most cases in not a good thing and you should always be aware of the consequences of your actions. There are many ways to cope with this pressure the best advise I can give you is the listen, assess, and decide the the situation. Listen to what is being asked of you to do. Then assess the question is this something I am capable of doing or should I do it. Lastly decide based off the information you have gathered should you or should you not do it. What are some consequences of my actions.
Answer:
An argumentative research paper is analytical, but it uses information as evidence to support its point, much as a lawyer uses evidence to make their case.
Explanation:
hope I got the right context. :)
This question is about "Hatchet"
Answer and Explanation:
1. The point of view used in the story only reveals Brian's thoughts and feelings, not showing us deeply any other character and what are their motivations, actions and thoughts. In that case, we can get to know Brian deeply and have sympathy for his actions.
2. Brian is a traumatic person who has had many sad moments. If the author used the point of view in first person, with Brian telling his own story, this could generate an exaggerated and biased narration. This is because for us, what has gone wrong is always much greater than we imagine. A third-person point of view, however, limited, can present Brian's facts and thoughts as they really are, impartially and let the reader make his own conclusion. Furthermore, the third-person point of view presents a reliable narrator, the first-person point of view does not present a reliable narrator.
Answer:
which is considered
who comes near it
whose
that measures
whose job it is
that the great white
where it lives
that is known
that crosses
that the great white
that was more
Explanation:
Relative clauses point to which thing or person the speaker is referring to.
Who is the relative clause for a person, and should be followed by a verb.
Whose is the relative clause used instead of his/hers/theirs and is followed by a noun.
Where refers to a place, and is followed by a noun or pronoun.
Which and that are used to talk about a thing.
