1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sashaice [31]
3 years ago
5

What was the significance of the Code of Hammurabi?

History
2 answers:
ankoles [38]3 years ago
6 0
The laws guaranteed equality between the rich and the poor.
ikadub [295]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The laws guaranteed equality between the rich and the poor.

Explanation:

The Code of Hammurabi is one of the oldest largest written texts ever found, and it is thought to be the predecesor to written laws, the code of hammurabi more than other thing is a compound of stories and cases, that set an example for what could be done in certain civic situations, it is also a compound of 282 rules that establish standards for regular interactions, it was important because it guaranteed equality in a trial for rich and the poor.

You might be interested in
Women’s suffrage in Arizona was granted by which reform measure?
V125BC [204]

the answer would be A or an initiative

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Based on the passage, how does Solomon’s wisdom benefit the Israelites? Check the three answers that apply. I NEED AN ANSWER NOW
ololo11 [35]
Please tel us the whole question. Thanks
5 0
3 years ago
What are some of the reasons that African American people have been protesting (after the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s)?
dem82 [27]

Answer:

Criminal Injustice

Explanation:

There is a statistically higher percentage of the African American population that is arrested, and on average, African American convicts receive longer sentences for the same crimes than their white counterparts. There is also a large amount of disproportionate police violence towards African American people.

3 0
3 years ago
In a least 150 words answer the following question. Which of the three economic systems (market, planned, and mixed) do you beli
sdas [7]
Scarcity is the fundamental challenge that all individuals and nations must confront. Everyone faces some limitations, so we all have to make choices where we limit or allow ourselves to something.

Economists generally recognize four types of economic systems traditional, traditional, command, market and mixed.

A traditional economic system is shaped by tradition. The work that people do, the goods and services they provide, how they exchange resources… all tend to follow a pattern. The traditional system is bad at addressing scarcity because scarcity is formed off of new requirements people have through the ages and a traditional system would not evolve just as our requirements would.

In a planned economy, the government controls the economy. The state decides how to use and distribute resources. The government regulates prices and wages; it may even determine what sorts of work individuals do.
Socialism is a prime example of a planned economy. Socialism does not work because it is not consistent with the fundamental principles of human behavior. The failure of socialism in countries around the world can be traced to one critical defect: it is a system that ignores incentives.

Market economies allow all economic decisions to be made by individuals. The unrestrained interactions between individuals and companies in the marketplace determine what happens to all the good and resources.Individuals choose how to invest their personal resources and individuals decide what to consume. Within a pure market economy,  the government is entirely absent from economic affairs.

A mixed economic system combines elements of the market and command economy. Many economic decisions are made in the market by individuals. But the government also plays a role in the allocation and distribution of resources.

If scarcity is looked at on a macro level, the best economic system is mixed because it allows the government to also plays a role in the allocation and distribution of resources, while the individuals still stay happy because they have some control. The only problem is the eternal question of what the right mix between the public and private sectors of the economy should be.

There is no point to look at it on a micro level because almost no country is small enough to be considered on that level.


6 0
3 years ago
During the colonial period, what was one difference between slave labor in the north and slave labor in the south?.
nekit [7.7K]

Answer:

Explanation:

Most of those enslaved in the North did not live in large communities, as they did in the mid-Atlantic colonies and the South. Those Southern economies depended upon people enslaved at plantations to provide labor and keep the massive tobacco and rice farms running.

8 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A fief managed land for a vassal.<br> true or false.
    15·2 answers
  • The author gives a multiple page description of the bombing of Hiroshima in 1945 by who was a child at the time. They were told
    7·1 answer
  • Who is credited with creating the mascot, or symbol, for both the Republican and Democratic parties? Thomas Pane James Madison T
    8·1 answer
  • Someone please help with this question! ​
    5·1 answer
  • A government principle by which the legislative, judicial, and executive powers are essentially held by different groups and peo
    13·2 answers
  • Question 1 (2 points)<br><br><br> #1<br><br> A<br><br><br> B<br><br><br> C<br><br><br> D
    7·1 answer
  • What caused Robert E Lee to reject an offer to command the Union Army
    11·1 answer
  • What was it like for Africans to be forced onto slave ships​
    13·1 answer
  • FDR’s presidental address is also known as the “ Infany Speech.” Originally, the the first line read , “ a date which will live
    9·1 answer
  • How have political parties influenced our government?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!