<span>The frequency of Border line personality disorder (BPD) is three times greater in women than men. The disorder is characterized by a pattern of continuous instability in moods, behavior, self-image. It often affects the functioning of the patient. It occurs within the context of relationships and friendship but all in all, females have shown a staggering 3:1 ratio of acquiring the disorder. They has been a lot of hypothesis why females are more vulnerable. Some psychiatrists attribute this trend to genetic or hormonal reason while others blame BPD on early-onset incest, other sexual abuse, or Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).</span>
Answer:
One of the reasons that it fell was the use of violence by the
Roman elite. After the attempted (mainly agrarian) reforms of theGracchi brothers, Tiberius and Gaius in the 130s to 120s BCE,
Explanation:
If I understood your question correctly, then the answer is "it depends". Sometimes, individuals have a large impact on starting a war (think World War I where one individual caused the war to start), other times groups of people have also important roles in starting a war (think World War II).
Hi there! Hopefully this helps!
The answer is B; The permanent migration of people from Germany to France.
<em>Remember: </em>If the movement is on the same continent, we say intracontinental migration.
Germany and France are on the same continent; Europe.
Answer:
Explanation:
By exercising its power to determine the constitutionality of federal and state government actions, the Supreme Court has developed a large body of judicial decisions, or “precedents,” interpreting the Constitution. How the Court uses precedent to decide controversial issues has prompted debate over whether the Court should follow rules identified in prior decisions or overrule them. The Court’s treatment of precedent implicates longstanding questions about how the Court can maintain stability in the law by adhering to precedent under the doctrine of stare decisis while correcting decisions that rest on faulty reasoning, unworkable standards, abandoned legal doctrines, or outdated factual assumptions.
