Answer:
NO, court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over the landscaper's contract claim
Explanation:
given data
landscape work = $30,000
seeking in damages = $100,000
solution
landscaper assert and maintain claim against an home owner for breach of contract is no because court have diversity of an citizenship in the jurisdiction over an home owner for negligence claims .
we know that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure permit only counter claims and federal court have not any subject matter jurisdiction over an landscaper contract claims
Risk that exists both before and after controls have been put in place is known as inherent risk.
What is risk?
The term "risk" refers to degree of unfortunately and possibility of loss, injury and hazard. Risk is barrier in the organization.
The various risk levels in a process that have not been regulated or mitigated by risk management are referred to as inherent risk. The level of risk present even in the absence of safeguards is known as inherent risk.
As a result, Inherent risk is risk in the absence of controls and after controls have been implemented.
Learn more about on risk, here:
brainly.com/question/14991895
#SPJ1
Indeed, most economists would argue that the best interests of international businesses are served by a <u>free-trade stance</u>.
<h3>What is a free-trade stance?</h3>
A free-trade stance is a government policy that does not restrict imports and exports because there are no import tariffs or export subsidies.
A free-trade stance is also known as laissez-faire policy because under a free-trade policy, goods and services are exchanged across international borders with little or no government interventions in the forms of tariffs, quotas, subsidies, or prohibitions.
Trade protectionism, which creates economic isolationism, is the direct opposite of the concept of free trade.
Thus, indeed, most economists would argue that the best interests of international businesses are served by a <u>free-trade stance</u>.
Learn more about the free-trade stance at brainly.com/question/10608502
Game theory suggests that competing firms in an oligopolistic industry may be reluctant to change prices because they anticipate that rivals will match price cuts but ignore price increases.
<h3>What is Game theory?</h3>
Game theory looks at the interactions between participants in a competitive game and calculates the best choice for the player.
Dominant strategy is the best option for a player regardless of what the other player is playing. Nash equilibrium is the best outcome for players where no player has an incentive to change their decisions.
Here are the options:
. too quick to raise prices because they will fail to anticipate that rivals may gain market shares.
b. reluctant to change prices because they anticipate that rivals will match price cuts but ignore price increases
c. reluctant to change prices because they anticipate that rivals will ignore price cuts but match price increases
d. too quick to cut prices because they fail to anticipate that rivals may also cut their prices.
To learn more about game theory, please check: brainly.com/question/25746243
Answer:
Informational appeals
Explanation:
Informational appeals are an effective way to show and explain your product or service to your potential customers. A company usually uses three types of informational appeal, or a mixture of the three:
- highlight your product's benefits or attributes
- make a product demonstration or comparison against its competitors
- use celebrity testimonials, or regular people testimonials (depends on the budget)
