Answer: Hello below is the complete question
A survey of entrepreneurs focused on their job characteristics, work habits, social activities, leisure time, etc. One question put to each entrepreneur was, "What make of car (U.S., Europe, or Japan) do you drive?" The responses (number in each category) for a sample of 100 entrepreneurs are summarized below. The goal of the analysis is to determine if the proportions of entrepreneurs who drive American, European, and Japanese cars differ.
U.S. Europe Japan
40 35 25
In order to determine whether the true proportions in each response category differ, a one-way chi-square analysis should be conducted. Suppose the p-value for the test was calculated to be p=0.1738 . What is the appropriate conclusion to make when testing at α = 0.10?
Answer : The conclusion to be drawn is that We cannot reject the Null hypothesis if we use a one-way chi square analysis because at α = 0.1 from the chi-square tabulated p-value = 0.584 while the calculated /given p-value is = 0.1738
Explanation:
Data given:
p-value = 0.1738
α = 0.10
sample size = 100
U.S cars = 40, Europe cars = 35, Japan cars = 25
The conclusion to be drawn is that We cannot reject the Null hypothesis if we use a one-way chi square analysis because at α = 0.1 from the chi-square tabulated p-value = 0.584 while the calculated /given p-value is = 0.1738
Answer:
The question is incomplete, the options are missing. The options are the following:
a) Suggest to Patrice that spreading negative information learned from eavesdropping is not healthy for the workplace.
b) Thank Patrice for speaking up and forward the item to a neutral third party for handling.
c) Immediately fire the team members who made the comments.
d) Contact the team member who was the subject of the comments to see if he or she was offended.
e) Thank Patrice for her input, but based on the harmlessness of the situation, take no further action.
And the correct answer is the option B: Thank Patrice for speaking up and forward the item to a neutral third party for handling.
Explanation:
To begin with, these kind of situations are most common than expected in the workplace so that is why that nowadays exist a lot of seminars about certain subjects that involves the behavior in the organization and furthermore there is the regular action of the Human Resources Department that takes cares of all the penalties and the solutions when it comes to subjects regarding the employees of the business and their relationship both with each other and with the company. So the correct way to act in this scenario would be to thank Patrice and tell her that the manager would inform to the Human Resources Department about it, being this last one a third party in the situation itself.
The category that does not belong to the periodic evaluation is Change Analysis.
Option D is the correct answer.
<h3>What is a periodic evaluation?</h3>
Periodic evaluation is a technique that is totally developmental in nature and disregards the formal advice relating to tenure, retention, or promotion of employees.
Periodic evaluation has three broad categories namely, hazard analysis, safety, and health-related inspections, and evaluation relating to personal protective equipment (PPE).
Therefore, out of the provided options, Change analysis is not considered a category for periodic evaluation.
Learn more about the periodic evaluation. in the related link;
brainly.com/question/17095233
#SPJ1
Answer:
Economic costs include both explicit costs and implicit costs.
Explanation:
- In economics, costs can be in the form of explicit and implicit as implicit costs are opportunity costs and are opportunities for engaging in business. While the explicit costs are accounting costs which are involved in the production of raw matter, wages etc.
Answer:
Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below:
Bonds payable A/c Dr $640,000
Premium on bonds payable A/c Dr $23,970
Loss on bonds redemption A/c $8,030
To Cash A/c $672,000 ($640,000 × 1.05)
(Being the redemption of bond is recorded and the remaining balance is debited to the Loss on bonds redemption account)
The Premium on bonds payable is computed below:
= Carrying value of the bonds - face value of the bond
= $663,970 - $640,000
= $23,970
