The question is incomplete. The complete question is:
Rebecca Minkoff's integration of technology and fashion has resulted in innovate products and an enjoyable shopping experience that stands out in the world of retail fashion. This illustrates _______.
a.multi-channel retailing
b.retail positioning
c.category management
d.atmospherics
e.store image
Answer:
Retail positioning
Explanation:
Retail positioning helps to differentiate a particular retailer from its competitors due to the various unique features possessed by the retailer.
This type of positioning helps to provide a high competitive advantage to the retailer by differentiating the business from the rest of it's competitors.
An effective positioning strategy can contribute immensely to a retailer's overall success in the market.
Rebecca Minkoff's integration of technology and fashion has positioned her in a top level in the retail market, it has made her business stand out among her competitors.
Answer:
<em>Frictional unemployment created by sectoral shifts </em>
Explanation:
Frictional unemployment <em>happens throughout a phase when employees are looking for new jobs or are transferring from old jobs to newer ones.</em>
It can even be defined as natural unemployment as it is not directly linked to factors that contribute to an economy that is performing poorly.
A new global trade agreement leads to higher demand for export-sector workers and lower demand for workers in import-competing sectors. Workers need time to change sectors, and sectoral shifts lead to frictional unemployment
Answer/Explanation:
Susan's veterinary expenses are deductible for adjusted gross income
because she is self-employed and at the same time her vet practice constitutes a business.
Therefore, all of her veterinary expenses are deductible for adjusted gross income.
Alexandra is said to be in a trade or business as an employee and
the unreimbursed expenses of an employee are deducted as miscellaneous itemized deductions.
Therefore, Alexandra only benefits if she itemizes her deductions while Susan will always get the full benefit of the deduction.
Number 1 = decrease
number 2= have an ambiguous change
Explanation:
a. Ralph is in charge of the land, with an implicit right to payment in compliance with right doctrine (North American Oil Consol. v. Burnet (1932, S.Ct.) 286 US 414). This year, however, gross sales are made, although they may be reimbursed later.
b. Unless he returns money to Acme this year, Ralph will be able to claim a deduction of $5,000. Although Ralph originally paid the $1,750 tax on invoice and only saved $1,400 on the reduction of the refund and because the repayment timing resulted in an additional $350 tax. As the amount refunded to Ralph is more than $3,000 according to IRC§ 1341a. This is possible for Ralph to use the taxes accrued in the next year from the same refund to cover taxes. So Ralph will say a tax offset of $1,750 instead of a deduction of $5,000.
c.The sum of the deduction must be more than $3,000, according to IRC § 1341(a). Because Ralph spent just $2,500, he is not liable for tax reduction deductions, but can only claim a refund deduction.
