1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Roman55 [17]
2 years ago
8

1. Do the tactics and the motives that led to the crusades provide any lessons for the conduct of foreign policy by the United S

tates and its allies toward the Middle East today?
History
1 answer:
tiny-mole [99]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

See explanation

Explanation:

(Note: This answer is subjective)

In comparing the motives of the crusades to the motives of the Unites States' foreign policy in the Middle East today, you could say the motivations are similar if you hold the belief that the crusades were motivated not just by religious zeal, but by a desire for cultural and regional hegemony that would lead to economic gain. In terms of tactics, further going off the idea that the crusades were motivated by more than simple piety, a parallel can be drawn between the crusades and the US's involvement in the MidEast through their use of a moral belief, in the case of the crusades the need to spread Catholocism, in the case of the US's involvement in the Middle East the need to spread democracy, to disguise a more "nefarious" motive, like a desire for cultural/regional hegemony or economic gain.

You might be interested in
Read the excerpt from The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone.
Licemer1 [7]

Answer:

Correct answer is D finally enabled scholars to unlock the Egyptian past.

Explanation:

Option D is the correct one, because it focuses on the importance of deciphering the hieroglyphs for the development of historical science. Scholars were finally able to discuss about history of Ancient Egypt.

Option A is not correct as people were finally able to read them after 1799.

Option B is not correct as this is not the central idea of the text.

Option C is not correct as the story starts a couple of millennium ago, not in 700 AD.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the united states enter the war in its last years after remaining neutral at the outset?
LekaFEV [45]

On December 11, 1941, the United States entered World War II. Mobilization began on December 8, 1941, when the United States declared war on Japan, one day after the Pearl Harbor assaults.

  • The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor prompted the United States of America to enter World War II. However, prior to the attack on Pearl Harbor, the United States took an indirect role in the war by selling munitions with Allied countries such as Britain. President Franklin D. Roosevelt perceived Nazi Germany as a threat to the United States and believed that arming the Allied democracies in Europe was important.
  • The United States began the war neutral, but ideologically supported the Allies. Although Congress did not initially approve military force against the Axis, the passage of the Lend-Lease Act was the first step toward entering World War II. While transporting Lend-Lease supplies to the Allies, the USS Greer was assaulted by Germans, prompting President Roosevelt to declare a shoot-on-sight policy.
  • The real, direct military engagement began only after the attack on Pearl Harbor. The Japanese provocation prompted Congress to vote virtually overwhelmingly to declare war on Japan. Adolf Hitler, the leader of Nazi Germany, declared war on the United States shortly after the attack on Pearl Harbor. These events resulted in America's direct military involvement in both the European and Pacific theaters, finally leading to the Axis countries' demise.

Learn more about World war II here :

brainly.com/question/26354465

#SPJ10

5 0
2 years ago
What were the differences between federalist (John Adams Party) and democratic republicans (Thomas Jefferson’s party)
enot [183]
Number 1 = <span>They distrusted the Federalist commitment to republicanism
number 2 = </span><span>oppose the centralizing policies of the new</span>
4 0
3 years ago
The legal segregation of races was a result of
OLga [1]
The legal segregation , was the A,The laws.
This was normally used in Southern States. Permitting legal segregation!
I hope this helps you!
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does the Supreme Court use opinion and the intentions of lawmakers at the
Mnenie [13.5K]
What role does the Supreme Court play in the lawmaking process?
Although the Supreme Court may hear an appeal on any question of law provided it has jurisdiction, it usually does not hold trials. Instead, the Court's task is to interpret the meaning of a law, to decide whether a law is relevant to a particular set of facts, or to rule on how a law should be applied
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were some of the key differences among the colonies of British North America around 1860
    7·1 answer
  • What are 3 reasons the english colonies in america grew at a faster rate?
    6·1 answer
  • Which country first adopted time zones and when that occurred?
    5·1 answer
  • Who was the first person to join the Women's Army Corps,or WAC?
    6·1 answer
  • How many leather footballs does Wilson make every day?
    7·2 answers
  • Why did so many new countries emerged after WW2?
    6·1 answer
  • Use the following post-World War II poster published by the European Recovery Program (ERP) to answer the question below: This i
    14·2 answers
  • What were the major events during World War II in<br> Europe?
    7·1 answer
  • Which economic system does the scenario
    5·1 answer
  • The Constitutional Convention was convened to....
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!