1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mars1129 [50]
3 years ago
8

Why did colonists object to tea act

History
2 answers:
Goryan [66]3 years ago
4 0
The colonist had objected to the tea act simply because they felt as if it was like all of the other taxes which were imposed on them by the British government <span />
kogti [31]3 years ago
3 0
Many colonists opposed the Act, not so much because it rescued the East India Company, but more because it seemed to validate the Townsend Tax on tea.<span />
You might be interested in
What was one outcome of laissez-faire economic policies?
Drupady [299]

Answer:bad working conditions

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How was the fall of the Qing dynasty effect China positively/negatively?
frozen [14]

Answer:

When the last Chinese dynasty—the Qing dynasty—fell in 1911–1912, it marked the end of the nation's incredibly long imperial history. That history stretched back at least as far as 221 BCE when Qin Shi Huangdi first united China into a single empire. During much of that time, China was the single, undisputed superpower in East Asia, with neighboring lands such as Korea, Vietnam, and an often-reluctant Japan trailing in its cultural wake. After more than 2,000 years, though, the Chinese imperial power under the last Chinese dynasty was about to collapse for good.

Explanation:

!!!!

4 0
1 year ago
How does the Reorganization Act represent the growth of the informal powers of the president?
zimovet [89]
The Reorganization Act allowed to president to hire confidential staff as he saw it fit, while also he was given the power to reorganize the executive branch of the government.
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
“If a nation is attacked the only recourse is to attack back” Agree or disagree and why?
LUCKY_DIMON [66]
Not really,

It is reliant on the intensity of the attack as well as the power of the attacking nation.
 some countries have been attacked and literally never fought back but surrendered if the attacking nation is more powerful in terms of military power.
in case the intensity of the attack can be absorbed, a country can also opt for diplomacy as war is the ultimate sanction in international relation.
in case the country feels it has the capacity to protect its sovereignty then fighting back is the only option.
 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ano ang karunungang bayan?
Neko [114]

Answer:

Ang tradisyunal na paniniwala ng isang pamayanan

Explanation:

Ang tradisyunal na paniniwala ng isang pamayanan

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did Japan do that caused America to get directly involved in World War
    9·1 answer
  • How did Galileo's work come into conflict with thechurch and how was it resolved?
    7·2 answers
  • Jesus’s teachings were based on which tradition? <br><br> Persian <br> Roman <br> Greek<br> Jewish
    15·2 answers
  • What is the main difference between horticultural societies and agricultural societies?
    15·2 answers
  • What purpose did the wall around a city serve?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the great powers had the biggest empire in the world in 1900
    11·1 answer
  • Write a Who, what, when, where, why, how summary about the Berlin Wall.
    14·2 answers
  • What is the first reason why the American dream could be achieved, write it in your own words
    6·1 answer
  • HELP THIS IS URGENT, ANSWER FOR BRAINLIEST
    13·2 answers
  • Name and explain one of the 4 ways to interpret the bible.
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!