Answer:
The alignment of numbers in the first part of the question is off. However, you solve this question as shown below. The correct answer is C. $1,124.
Explanation:
This is a one-time cashflow type of question where the principal amount is invested once and no other addition is made to the account. You use the future value formula to solve the result of the compounding effect at year 3.
FV formula;
FV = PV(1+r)^n
PV = 800
discount rate; r = 12% or 0.12
total duration of investment; n = 3
therefore; FV = 800(1+0.12)^3
FV = 800 * 1.404928
FV = 1123.94
To the nearest whole dollar, the amount will grow to $1,124
One truth about Zahara's risk levels is that<u> D. The </u><u>speculative investments </u><u>are </u><u>high risk </u><u>but can </u><u>pay returns quickly.</u>
<h3>What are speculative investments?</h3>
- Investments that are bought for their tendency to change prices often.
- Are known to be risky.
By investing in speculative investments, Zahara is incurring risk but as a result, she stands to gain returns quickly if the investments should increase in price.
In conclusion, option D is correct.
Find out more on speculative investments at brainly.com/question/13827370.
mr. josh kenney, a u.s. citizen and resident of vermont, owns 100 percent of the stock of jk services, which is incorporated under vermont law and conducts business in four counties in the state.
There are three taxpayers identified in the given situation and these are as follows:
Mr. Josh Kenny
JK Services
JK Realty
Governments with jurisdiction in the given case are as follows:
Mr. Josh Kenny falls under the State of Vermont where he is a resident and
JK Services falls under the State of Vermont where it is incorporated and operates and
JK Realty falls under the City of Boston where it is operates.
To know more about taxpayers here:
brainly.com/question/14782474
#SPJ4
Answer:
What unit values should Herman use for each of its products when applying the lower of cost or net realizable value (LCNRV) rule to ending inventory?
- Product 1: $26 (cost)
- Product 2: $86 (NRV)
- Product 3: $56 (cost)
Explanation:
Product 1 Product 2 Product 3
Cost $26 $96 $56
Selling price $58 $138 $88
Costs to sell $6 $52 $16
net realizable value $52 $86 $72
which is lower? $26 (cost) $86 (NRV) $56 (cost)
the net realizable value = selling price minus any costs associated to the sales process