Locke is referring to slavery, specifically claiming that it isn't fair to own or dominate anyone else.
Please mark brainliest if this helps!
Have a wonderful rest of your day!
Explanation:
im pretty sure its the second one
Answer:
Ghana charged a tax for trade within the kingdom.
<span>---> The samurai, who were the ruling class, enjoyed many privileges. They could kill a peasant to test a new sword and walk away.
---> </span><span>The United States is a democracy, while medieval Japan was a police state ruled by the shogun.
</span>
---><span>If Sano wants to torture a suspect he’s interrogating (FYI, he never actually does), the suspect can’t file a complaint and Sano won’t get in trouble. He also never needs a search warrant. </span>
In <em>Omar Khayyam's "RUBAIYAT OF OMAR KHAYYAM," Edward Fitzgerald </em>noted that pupils of Imam Mowaffak believed that they would all become fabulously rich in this world.
But since there is no certainty in this, the author asks what becomes of the fate of those who could not attain wealthy statuses, despite their strong belief.
Thus, the word<em> "ours" </em>in the first line of the poem refers to the pupils who may fail to become rich, notwithstanding that they <em>strongly believed and hoped</em> for their teacher's lessons to become real in their lives.
Related link: brainly.com/question/17948484
