The Hound of the Baskervilles is the third of the crime novels written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle featuring the detective Sherlock Holmes. Originally serialised in The Strand Magazine from August 1901 to April 1902, it is set largely on Dartmoor in Devon in England's West Country and tells the story of an attempted murder inspired by the legend of a fearsome, diabolical hound of supernatural origin. Sherlock Holmes and his companion Dr. Watson investigate the case. This was the first appearance of Holmes since his apparent death in "The Final Problem", and the success of The Hound of the Baskervilles led to the character's eventual revival.
In 2003, the book was listed as number 128 of 200 on the BBC's The Big Read poll of the UK's "best-loved novel."[2] In 1999, it was listed as the top Holmes novel, with a perfect rating from Sherlockian scholars of 100.<span>[3]</span>
Answer:
i pretty sure its a It makes it seem lonely and wild.
Explanation:
If one wanted to write an essay that describes the results of two scientific experiments are different which would be the best way to organize it is by using the compare and contrast organizational structure.
<h3>What is a compare and contrast organizational structure?</h3>
A writer must perform the following in a comparison/contrast structure:
1) Identify and explain three or more essential points shared by two or more subjects.
2) Show how these points are similar and different.
3) Create a thesis statement outlining his or her perspective on the two themes
Learn more about organizational structure:
brainly.com/question/2636977
#SPJ1
A) First Option
Reason: I did Process Of Elimination. The last definition talking about London, is not it, the one before the last one talks about a charge made for goods, which is also not it. Also, a bundle made for transportation, that's not money, that's like Carrots being sent to the store. So, to me, it has to be the first option.
conversation about the Black Lives Matter Movement, and the legacy that sparked it, with one of the world's leading experts on policing
Professor Daniel Nagin is the 2014 recipient of the prestigious Stockholm Prize on Criminology, an elected fellow of the American Society of Criminology, and the Teresa and H. John Heinz III University Professor of Public Policy and Statistics. His research focuses on the evolution of criminal and antisocial behaviors over the life course the deterrent effect of criminal and non-criminal penalties on illegal behaviors, and the development of statistical methods for analyzing longitudinal data.
In the wake of recent incidences of lethal violence involving law enforcement officials in Baton Rouge, Falcon Heights, and Dallas, we sat down with Nagin to talk to him about what factors led to these events, why there is apparent mistrust between citizens and law enforcement officials, and what policy, research, and training measures can be taken to help prevent these situations in the future.
