Many ways such as the articles of confederation but later after realized they were to weak and created the Supreme Court and amendments to stabilize our government
Answer:
C. Lack of a bill of rights in the new constitution is problematic is the correct answer.
Explanation:
The Anti Federalists were the politicians who were against the US constitution which was adopted in 1787. They considered the constitution to be giving too much power to the central government and they were afraid of giving too much power to single national government as the government could infringe upon the rights of citizens and states. Patrick Henry, James Winthrop and George Mason were some of the famous Anti federalists. They were afraid of the new constitution because the states were given more power in Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union while it wasn't so in the new constitution. Their influence led to the passage of bill of rights. They wanted to establish a weak Central government as was in Articles of Confederation and wanted for strong central governments.
The thing that they should do in that situation is: <span>you must slow to the slowest speed at which you can safely steer your vessel.
The law enforcement probably want to do a quick checkup to you and you could only proceed after the officer clear you out from potential violations</span>
Answer:
Intergenerational mobility
Explanation:
When a change of socio-economic status takes place in between generations it is known as Intergenerational mobility.
Here, Sarah is from a lower-middle-class family i.e., her parents belongs to the lower-middle-class. Sarah became a doctor with the help of a scholarship. She was earning more than what her parents were earning. So, she moved up to the upper-middle class. This happened between her and her parents generation.
Hence, Sarah's movement is best described as Intergenerational mobility.
Answer:
It's egoist because it's imposed by an Almighty Power (God in this case), and even if you have the free will, one way or another, it's a condition to be good.
It's consequentialist because every choice you make, based on God's commandments, you will have a consequence, for the good or for the bad.
And finally, it's deontological because you are morally conditioned to choose, you don't have the option to put aside, it's a social convention to choose.
Explanation:
The Divine Command Theory address that everything that happens is based on the power and choice of an Almighty Power and humans are conditioned to choose. Even with the free will, the social and moral conditions demands a choice, that's why it's an egoist, consequentialist and deontological theory.
