Answer:
More enforcement.
Explanation:
There should be more resources put into enforcement of policies meant to curb discrimination.
A careful reading of the history of the “idea” of family preservation as well as an appraisal of the recent policy context for its adoption—as illuminated by Berry (1997), Schorr (1997), McCroskey and Meezan (1997), and others—suggests that all three explanations—dissensus on values, practice lacunae, and organizational complexities—may to a degree be valid. At a minimum, these and other trenchant commentaries such as those provided recently by Littell and Schuerman (1999) and Halpern (1999) suggest that any discussion of the “practice” of family preservation absent its historical/valuative roots and current organizational and policy context will be incomplete.
That said, this present paper will focus on some of the most vexing challenges of implementing family preservation practice, some of its enduring legacies as a practice modality, and some of the longer range problems in developing practice theory and application that it has illuminated
Answer:
Democracy
Explanation:
Democracy is a government where power and civic responsiblity are used by all adult citizens, directly, or through their freely elected resentatives.
The answer is C. He believed the government should be run by the rich, able well born/ elites.
Answer:
Failed communication
Explanation:
Because very few cues would be available to capture message complexity.
