It was the name of the boundary that divided Europe at the end of WW2
7/8 and 1/3 or anything that doesn't simplify to 5/8 and 1/2
The differences were far greater. For starters, they had different beliefs, and not only religious beliefs but about life in general. They also used different weaponry and went through different types of training. Knights would also have land and control it while pledging allegiance to the King, while Samurai were not as powerful as nights were and were more just soldiers. They also came from different social backgrounds. If a knight's king would die they would just pledge their allegiance to the new king, while Samurai's lord's death would mean more or less the end of a samurai's job.
Answer:
Ayaw pag salig diri sa brainly pag answer og imo
Explanation:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Answer:
Speaker A differs from B because of one reason, which is this story: money
"A" has a good point by thinking that if you have enough money to buy a house on the spot, you shouldn't need to gain Social Security. But heres one thing "A" doesn't think about: what if said person runs out of money. The point of Social Security is to give money to the people that paid their taxes and if your retired. If your retired, you don't have a job, which means the only money you would be getting back is Social Security. Now, this starts to make it sound like im siding with "B" yes I am. However, I think to even this out, lower the amount of Social Security you get so both "A" and "B" get an even share of their opinions.
(hope my mindset was in the right place for this question)
