1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stich3 [128]
4 years ago
13

If no judicial court of authority, namely the united states supreme court, has stricken the 1973 war powers act and declared it

null and void constitutionally, how is it that the authors of the text book are able to conclude congress has few, if any, war powers remaining? how can this be? the law is the law, is it not? (specifically, explain the political phenomenon that has occurred here and has similarly occurred in other legal and constitutional matters allowing the law to be ignored.)
History
1 answer:
masya89 [10]4 years ago
8 0

The textbook’s authors are correct to conclude that Congress only has few, if there is any, powers remaining. Congress hasn’t declared war since 1941 of December, clearly presenting that Congress has no control over whether United States can go to war. One major reason that Congress is in this situation is because the president claims that that he inherent the sole executive power to defend America’s interest. Another major reason for Congress lack of war power is because of Truman.

You might be interested in
Question 14(Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)
Misha Larkins [42]
Sugar tabaco cotton and wood
3 0
3 years ago
The expansion of the rail networks led to
zvonat [6]
<span>The correct answer is A:a growth in the steel industry. In order to build the railroad network, large amounts of steel were needed for the rails on the tracks. Steel was also a key component of the locomotives themselves. Thus, the expansion of this system required more steel to be produced and a growth of this industry.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What statements are true about the pullman strike
nika2105 [10]

Answer:

The Pullman Company lost more money fighting the strike than it would have paid out by giving in to workers.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Why did the invasion of Poland have a significant effect on World War II?
Margarita [4]

Answer:

The invasion of Poland marked the start of World War 2. Britain and France were not convinced that it was a defensive war and it all began world war 2. Poland was also divided between the USSR and Germany so the Western Allies saw that their tactic of starving Germany of resources would be impossible since the USSR continued to supply the Germans at that stage of the war. New tactics and technology were tested in Poland and those same tactics will later be even more developed against France.

4 0
3 years ago
in the classical world, historians often described past events as caused by fate, gods, or other supernatural factors. Today, hi
Agata [3.3K]
The following conclusions that the statement supported is : The accepted interpretations about past events can change greatly over time.

In the past, it may be accepted to explain some unknown occurrence as 'supernatural'. These days, those explanation would not be accepted, since all of the explanation have to be supported by the actual data and evidence
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which quotation best describes John Muir’s philosophy?
    10·2 answers
  • An important characteristic of civilization is economic activity. true or false
    12·1 answer
  • Which was not a result of Thomas Jefferson’s Embargo Act of 1807
    10·1 answer
  • History question down below
    15·2 answers
  • the coexistence of rulers and councils of elders in african states in the period circa 1200-1450 best demonstrates
    15·1 answer
  • What were the effects after Diocletian split the Roman Empire?
    12·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    7·1 answer
  • What is the relationship between historical questions and historical
    15·1 answer
  • Which colonial group was established around 1770 in order to help colonists participate in boycotts against British goods?
    14·2 answers
  • Was king henry the eighth really that thick or were the painters just exaggerating his form
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!