1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stich3 [128]
4 years ago
13

If no judicial court of authority, namely the united states supreme court, has stricken the 1973 war powers act and declared it

null and void constitutionally, how is it that the authors of the text book are able to conclude congress has few, if any, war powers remaining? how can this be? the law is the law, is it not? (specifically, explain the political phenomenon that has occurred here and has similarly occurred in other legal and constitutional matters allowing the law to be ignored.)
History
1 answer:
masya89 [10]4 years ago
8 0

The textbook’s authors are correct to conclude that Congress only has few, if there is any, powers remaining. Congress hasn’t declared war since 1941 of December, clearly presenting that Congress has no control over whether United States can go to war. One major reason that Congress is in this situation is because the president claims that that he inherent the sole executive power to defend America’s interest. Another major reason for Congress lack of war power is because of Truman.

You might be interested in
The statement, "With American and British scientists
alina1380 [7]

Answer:

all of the above

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How were people of occupied territories treated by the axis powers
LUCKY_DIMON [66]
They were put in concentration camps. Some of them were put in gas chambers, some of them just straight up starved and/or died of thirst from being treated so badly. Its really sad actually. Hitler was an evil man. It was a horrible part of history indeed. Millions of innocent people died. D:
4 0
4 years ago
Hello frends what are you doing<br>......​
harina [27]

Explanation:

answering this question

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can you guys pls help me! Click on my acc bc the newest questions from today were do two weeks ago! Pls help!
igomit [66]

Answer:

ok you have to search or I can tell you

Explanation:

i will help ready ok

5 0
3 years ago
WWII was considered a direct result of ________
irga5000 [103]

Answer:

The turmoil left behind by ww1

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following did Columbus NOT bring back with him from his voyages to the "New World"?
    8·2 answers
  • DNA is an organic polymer (a big molecule) composed of monomers (building blocks) called
    8·1 answer
  • How did hobbes and rousseau differ
    9·1 answer
  • For over 300 years, Cuba has been a colony of...
    13·2 answers
  • How did the United States acquire the middle 1/3 of our country in the early 19th Century?
    11·1 answer
  • What did many women do in mining towns?
    12·1 answer
  • Who is Harold Klemp?
    7·1 answer
  • Similarities between Bhaktism and sufism​
    9·1 answer
  • The Depression wiped out banks, businesses, and families. Every week for the first three years of the Depression, one hundred th
    15·2 answers
  • What does Brutus say would have happened if the senators had not killed Caesar
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!