<span>Reconstruction brought many changes. The 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments promised great changes in the lives of African Americans. Unfortunately, there were constant attempts to strip African Americans of the new freedoms promised by the Constitution.</span>
Answer:
<em>water</em><em> </em><em>rout</em><em>e</em>
Explanation:
The Romans would have been more likely to choose a water route to Spain. A water route would have been much shorter, and stops restock supplies could have been made at Sardinia and other islands along the way.
I hope this helps you
Answer:
Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) is a historical case examined by the Supreme Court. By a decision in this case, the court established that any evidence, whether confessing or exculpatory, can be used in court only if the prosecution can prove that the suspect was informed before the interrogation about the right to a lawyer and about the right not to testify against himself. At the same time, in case of refusal of the suspect from his rights, it is necessary to prove its voluntariness. The Miranda case set a precedent requiring all police departments to inform detainees of their rights to a lawyer and silence. These warnings are called the Miranda rule. The Supreme Court equated the Miranda Rule with constitutional acts.
Explanation:
Answer:
They built weeled carts called chariots
Explanation:
The Assyrians were a warlike people that primarily is known for their chariots improved carts from Summarians
Answer:
1st Amendment freedom of speech.
Explanation:
The Supreme Court case of Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988) involves the students and principal of Hazelwood East High School. The issue pertains to a report or stories about teen pregnancy and the impacts of divorce on children, which the school principal decided to delete without informing the student body.
This led to the court case, with the students claiming the principal violated their right to free speech. This freedom of speech is included in the First Amendment to the United States. And in a loss to the students, the court decided that the school had the right to remove contents it believed will be detrimental or bad for the overall student population.
Thus, the correct answer is the first option.