Answer:
<h2>
f(4) = -10
</h2><h2>
</h2><h2>
x = 0
</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
From the graph attached,
For x = 4,
Value of the function will be,
f(4) = y value at x = 4
f(4) = -10
Similarly, for y = g(x) = 2,
x value of the function will be,
x = 0
For which g(0) = 2
Therefore, for x = 0 value of the function will be 2.
g(0) = 2
Answer:
Part (a)
36
Part (b)
Find the filled table in the attachment
Part (c)
1/36
Step-by-step explanation:
The total number of possible outcomes using the multiplicative rule is given by;
6*6 = 36.
There are 6 possible outcomes in rolling each die, we simply find the product.
The probability of rolling double sixes is given by;
pr(6 and 6) = pr(6) * pr(6) = 1/6 * 1/6 = 1/36
The probability of rolling double sixes represents independent events and thus we employ the multiplicative rule of probability.

<h3>Further explanation</h3>
We will calculate the unit conversion factor used to convert its engine displacement from cubic-centimeters to cubic-inches.
The relationships between inch and cm are as follows:

Inches and cm represent units of length.
Made into fractions, 1 inch as the denominator and 2.54 cm as the numerator.

As a unit conversion factor of volume, the numerator and the denominator in cubic.


Thus, we get the unit conversion factor

Let's use this unit conversion factor to calculate its engine displacement in new units.

Note for cm³ units that have been crossed out.
The conversion result is 
<h3>Learn more</h3>
- Convert cubic-kilometers to cubic-meters brainly.com/question/1446243
- How to write in scientific notation brainly.com/question/7263463
- Calculating mass based on density and volume brainly.com/question/4053884
Keywords: the motorcycle engine, Kawasaki Ninja 1000, 1043 cubic-centimeters (cm³), to calculate, its engine displacement, in cubic-inches (in³), what unit conversion factor
Answer:
We conclude that (4, 2) is NOT a solution to the system of equations.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the system of equations


Important Tip:
- In order to determine whether (4, 2) is a solution to the system of equations or not, we need to solve the system of equations.
Let us solve the system of equations using the elimination method.

Arrange equation variables for elimination

Subtract the equations




Now, solve -2x = 6 for x

Divide both sides by -2

Simplify

For y - x = -2 plug in x = -3


Subtract 3 from both sides

Simplify

The solution to the system of equations is:
(x, y) = (-3, -5)
Checking the graph
From the graph, it is also clear that (4, 2) is NOT a solution to the system of equations because (-3, -5) is the only solution as we have found earlier.
Therefore, we conclude that (4, 2) is NOT a solution to the system of equations.